Revealing children’s implicit spelling representations

Sarah Critten, Karen J. Pine, David J. Messer

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    6 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Conceptualizing the underlying representations and cognitive mechanisms of children's spelling development is a key challenge for literacy researchers. Using the Representational Redescription model (Karmiloff-Smith), Critten, Pine and Steffler (2007) demonstrated that the acquisition of phonological and morphological knowledge may be underpinned by increasingly explicit levels of spelling representation. However, their proposal that implicit representations may underlie early ‘visually based’ spelling remains unresolved. Children (N = 101, aged 4–6 years) were given a recognition task (Critten et al., 2007) and a novel production task, both involving verbal justifications of why spellings are correct/incorrect, strategy use and word pattern similarity. Results for both tasks supported an implicit level of spelling characterized by the ability to correctly recognize/produce words but the inability to explain operational strategies or generalize knowledge. Explicit levels and multiple representations were also in evidence across the two tasks. Implications for cognitive mechanisms underlying spelling development are discussed.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)198–211
    JournalBritish Journal of Developmental Psychology
    Volume31
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2013

    Fingerprint

    Aptitude
    Child Development
    Research Personnel
    Literacy

    Bibliographical note

    The full text of this item is not available from the repository.

    Keywords

    • education
    • spelling
    • children

    Cite this

    Revealing children’s implicit spelling representations. / Critten, Sarah; Pine, Karen J.; Messer, David J.

    In: British Journal of Developmental Psychology, Vol. 31, No. 2, 2013, p. 198–211.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Critten, Sarah ; Pine, Karen J. ; Messer, David J. / Revealing children’s implicit spelling representations. In: British Journal of Developmental Psychology. 2013 ; Vol. 31, No. 2. pp. 198–211.
    @article{bf73e827a1354b1684742a7dcf331237,
    title = "Revealing children’s implicit spelling representations",
    abstract = "Conceptualizing the underlying representations and cognitive mechanisms of children's spelling development is a key challenge for literacy researchers. Using the Representational Redescription model (Karmiloff-Smith), Critten, Pine and Steffler (2007) demonstrated that the acquisition of phonological and morphological knowledge may be underpinned by increasingly explicit levels of spelling representation. However, their proposal that implicit representations may underlie early ‘visually based’ spelling remains unresolved. Children (N = 101, aged 4–6 years) were given a recognition task (Critten et al., 2007) and a novel production task, both involving verbal justifications of why spellings are correct/incorrect, strategy use and word pattern similarity. Results for both tasks supported an implicit level of spelling characterized by the ability to correctly recognize/produce words but the inability to explain operational strategies or generalize knowledge. Explicit levels and multiple representations were also in evidence across the two tasks. Implications for cognitive mechanisms underlying spelling development are discussed.",
    keywords = "education, spelling, children",
    author = "Sarah Critten and Pine, {Karen J.} and Messer, {David J.}",
    note = "The full text of this item is not available from the repository.",
    year = "2013",
    doi = "10.1111/bjdp.12000",
    language = "English",
    volume = "31",
    pages = "198–211",
    journal = "British Journal of Developmental Psychology",
    issn = "0261-510X",
    publisher = "Wiley",
    number = "2",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Revealing children’s implicit spelling representations

    AU - Critten, Sarah

    AU - Pine, Karen J.

    AU - Messer, David J.

    N1 - The full text of this item is not available from the repository.

    PY - 2013

    Y1 - 2013

    N2 - Conceptualizing the underlying representations and cognitive mechanisms of children's spelling development is a key challenge for literacy researchers. Using the Representational Redescription model (Karmiloff-Smith), Critten, Pine and Steffler (2007) demonstrated that the acquisition of phonological and morphological knowledge may be underpinned by increasingly explicit levels of spelling representation. However, their proposal that implicit representations may underlie early ‘visually based’ spelling remains unresolved. Children (N = 101, aged 4–6 years) were given a recognition task (Critten et al., 2007) and a novel production task, both involving verbal justifications of why spellings are correct/incorrect, strategy use and word pattern similarity. Results for both tasks supported an implicit level of spelling characterized by the ability to correctly recognize/produce words but the inability to explain operational strategies or generalize knowledge. Explicit levels and multiple representations were also in evidence across the two tasks. Implications for cognitive mechanisms underlying spelling development are discussed.

    AB - Conceptualizing the underlying representations and cognitive mechanisms of children's spelling development is a key challenge for literacy researchers. Using the Representational Redescription model (Karmiloff-Smith), Critten, Pine and Steffler (2007) demonstrated that the acquisition of phonological and morphological knowledge may be underpinned by increasingly explicit levels of spelling representation. However, their proposal that implicit representations may underlie early ‘visually based’ spelling remains unresolved. Children (N = 101, aged 4–6 years) were given a recognition task (Critten et al., 2007) and a novel production task, both involving verbal justifications of why spellings are correct/incorrect, strategy use and word pattern similarity. Results for both tasks supported an implicit level of spelling characterized by the ability to correctly recognize/produce words but the inability to explain operational strategies or generalize knowledge. Explicit levels and multiple representations were also in evidence across the two tasks. Implications for cognitive mechanisms underlying spelling development are discussed.

    KW - education

    KW - spelling

    KW - children

    U2 - 10.1111/bjdp.12000

    DO - 10.1111/bjdp.12000

    M3 - Article

    VL - 31

    SP - 198

    EP - 211

    JO - British Journal of Developmental Psychology

    JF - British Journal of Developmental Psychology

    SN - 0261-510X

    IS - 2

    ER -