Rethinking encounter through parochial meaning-making on the urban margins in South Africa

Tamlyn Monson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)
6 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Originating in normative interventions aiming to remedy segregation through contact with difference, the notion of ‘meaningful encounter’ has become a portmanteau for contact that results in greater respect and tolerance. This article questions the epistemic justice of such a value-laden concept by presenting four examples of parochial meaning-making around encounters in a South African informal settlement. Drawing on secondary interviews conducted after ‘xenophobic’ expulsions of foreign-born newcomers from the settlement in 2008, as well as primary ethnographic fieldwork conducted four years later, the article highlights the meaningfulness of four encounters that did not lead to increased tolerance or respect for difference—encounters with affluence; with social mobility; with hardship in conditions of poverty and marginality; and with seemingly uncommitted newcomers against a backdrop of contentious politics. In each case, the article illustrates both the meaningfulness of the encounter, and its effect of producing tensions rather than mediating them. The article uses these examples to problematise the assumptions implicit in received notions of ‘meaningful encounter’: that tension necessarily pre-exist encounter, that established/newcomer boundaries are based on prejudice, and that encounters are not meaningful unless they advance a predetermined normative position. Along the way, it highlights the importance of embodiment, materiality, inequality, and space in the production of difference. Having made the case for a conceptual sharpening in the light of these seldom-studied encounters in the urban margins of South Africa, the article concludes by urging scholars to adopt a value-free conception of the meaningfulness of encounter.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbermnad019
JournalMigration Studies
Volume12
Issue number2
Early online date25 Jul 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2024

Bibliographical note

Copyright © and Moral Rights are retained by the author(s) and/ or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This item cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder(s). The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.

This document is the author’s post-print version, incorporating any revisions agreed during the peer-review process. Some differences between the published version and this version may remain and you are advised to consult the published version if you wish to cite from it.

Funding

This work was supported by the Agence Nationale de la Recherche [ANR-10-SUDS-0009]; African Centre for Migration and Society. Acknowledgements This work was supported by the Agence Nationale de la Recherche [ANR-10-SUDS-0009]; African Centre for Migration and Society. Acknowledgements Fieldwork for part of this project was carried out in 2008 by the African Centre for Migration and Society, University of the Witwatersrand.

FundersFunder number
African Centre for Migration and Society
University of the Witwatersrand
Agence Nationale de la ResearcheANR-10-SUDS-0009
Agence Nationale de la Researche

    Keywords

    • meaningful encounter
    • epistemic justice
    • materiality of difference
    • xenophobia
    • prejudice
    • South Africa
    • Informal settlements

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Sociology and Political Science
    • Urban Studies
    • Geography, Planning and Development

    Themes

    • Migration (In)Equality and Belonging
    • Equality and Inclusion

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Rethinking encounter through parochial meaning-making on the urban margins in South Africa'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this