Rethinking concepts of the strange and the stranger

Lucy Jackson, Catherine Harris, Gill Valentine

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

30 Citations (Scopus)
154 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In this paper, we analyse debates regarding the strange and the stranger. In critiquing these debates in geography and the social sciences, we argue that the stranger as a term is often taken for granted and implies assumed knowledge. In deconstructing ‘the stranger’ in the complexities of the modern world, defined by hyper-mobility, super-diversity and increased contact with ‘strangers’, we question the way in which such definitions might lead us to new distinctions allowing us to think beyond the stranger as a figure in isolation to something more relational and complex in nature. In so doing, we flesh out a way in which the geographies of encounter and thinking across difference might build on these theoretical considerations to further knowledge across and beyond difference as identity category, social construct and lived materiality.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-15
Number of pages15
JournalSocial and Cultural Geography
Volume18
Issue number1
Early online date1 Nov 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Social and Cultural Geography on 01/11/2016, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/14649365.2016.1247192

Copyright © and Moral Rights are retained by the author(s) and/ or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This item cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder(s). The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Rethinking concepts of the strange and the stranger'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this