Abstract
We thank Dr Singhal1 for their interest in our article.2 The observations made by Dr Singhal are accurate in that inverted body mass index (iBMI) predicted 0.2% greater variance in body fatness than body mass index (BMI). However, we believe our assertion that iBMI is ‘better’ than BMI in our sample population is still valid and appropriate.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1274 |
Journal | European Journal of Clinical Nutrition |
Volume | 68 |
Issue number | 11 |
DOIs |
|
Publication status | Published - Nov 2014 |
Bibliographical note
The published record of this letter to the editor is not available on the repository.Keywords
- accuracy
- body fat
- body mass
- child
- childhood obesity
- disease association
- human
- inverted body mass index
- Letter
- medical research
- nutritional assessment
- nutritional status
- nutritional value
- outcome assessment
- prediction