Abstract
The Buchwalter et al. ET&C Focus article [1] is a very timely piece given the review of the method used by the USEPA to derive water quality criteria (WQC; [2]), and also because of the ongoing push for increased international harmonization of derivation methods for WQC (and their analogues in other jurisdictions) (e.g. [3, 4, 5]). Buchwalter et al. [1] provide a cogent argument not only for the expansion of the definition of data that are acceptable to derive WQC, but also for a more holistic paradigm to deriving WQC.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1422-1424 |
| Number of pages | 3 |
| Journal | Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry |
| Volume | 36 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| Early online date | 25 May 2017 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jun 2017 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Environmental Chemistry
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Response to Buchwalter et al.: Further Considerations for Modernising Water Quality Criteria in the USA and Elsewhere'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS