Resist or comply: The power dynamics of organisational routines during merger

Mehdi Safavi, Omid Omidvar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)
7 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The role of power and agency in the development of organizational routines is under-theorized. In this paper, we draw on an in-depth qualitative case study of a merger between two academic institutions, a college of art and a university, and examine the diverging responses of two organizational routines (admissions and budgeting) during the course of the merger to understand how power dynamics contribute to resistance/compliance of routines. Our findings suggest that the differences in routines’ responses to a merger initiative can be explained by applying Bourdieu's theory of practice and by employing the concepts of field and symbolic capital to unpack power relations in the context of organizational routines, and to disclose why some routine participants can exercise their agency while others cannot. We find that (a) the field within which a routine operates and (b) the actors’ symbolic capital and position-taking during change implementation shape routines’ responses to organizational change initiatives.

Publisher Statement: This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)550-566
Number of pages17
JournalBritish Journal of Management
Volume27
Issue number3
Early online date2 May 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2016

Fingerprint

Budget control
Compliance
Mergers
Organizational routines

Cite this

Resist or comply: The power dynamics of organisational routines during merger. / Safavi, Mehdi; Omidvar, Omid.

In: British Journal of Management, Vol. 27, No. 3, 07.2016, p. 550-566.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Safavi, Mehdi ; Omidvar, Omid. / Resist or comply: The power dynamics of organisational routines during merger. In: British Journal of Management. 2016 ; Vol. 27, No. 3. pp. 550-566.
@article{44a548dafc744a2caea6dae7c9f9386c,
title = "Resist or comply: The power dynamics of organisational routines during merger",
abstract = "The role of power and agency in the development of organizational routines is under-theorized. In this paper, we draw on an in-depth qualitative case study of a merger between two academic institutions, a college of art and a university, and examine the diverging responses of two organizational routines (admissions and budgeting) during the course of the merger to understand how power dynamics contribute to resistance/compliance of routines. Our findings suggest that the differences in routines’ responses to a merger initiative can be explained by applying Bourdieu's theory of practice and by employing the concepts of field and symbolic capital to unpack power relations in the context of organizational routines, and to disclose why some routine participants can exercise their agency while others cannot. We find that (a) the field within which a routine operates and (b) the actors’ symbolic capital and position-taking during change implementation shape routines’ responses to organizational change initiatives.Publisher Statement: This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.",
author = "Mehdi Safavi and Omid Omidvar",
year = "2016",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1111/1467-8551.12167",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "550--566",
journal = "British Journal of Management",
issn = "1045-3172",
publisher = "Wiley",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Resist or comply: The power dynamics of organisational routines during merger

AU - Safavi, Mehdi

AU - Omidvar, Omid

PY - 2016/7

Y1 - 2016/7

N2 - The role of power and agency in the development of organizational routines is under-theorized. In this paper, we draw on an in-depth qualitative case study of a merger between two academic institutions, a college of art and a university, and examine the diverging responses of two organizational routines (admissions and budgeting) during the course of the merger to understand how power dynamics contribute to resistance/compliance of routines. Our findings suggest that the differences in routines’ responses to a merger initiative can be explained by applying Bourdieu's theory of practice and by employing the concepts of field and symbolic capital to unpack power relations in the context of organizational routines, and to disclose why some routine participants can exercise their agency while others cannot. We find that (a) the field within which a routine operates and (b) the actors’ symbolic capital and position-taking during change implementation shape routines’ responses to organizational change initiatives.Publisher Statement: This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

AB - The role of power and agency in the development of organizational routines is under-theorized. In this paper, we draw on an in-depth qualitative case study of a merger between two academic institutions, a college of art and a university, and examine the diverging responses of two organizational routines (admissions and budgeting) during the course of the merger to understand how power dynamics contribute to resistance/compliance of routines. Our findings suggest that the differences in routines’ responses to a merger initiative can be explained by applying Bourdieu's theory of practice and by employing the concepts of field and symbolic capital to unpack power relations in the context of organizational routines, and to disclose why some routine participants can exercise their agency while others cannot. We find that (a) the field within which a routine operates and (b) the actors’ symbolic capital and position-taking during change implementation shape routines’ responses to organizational change initiatives.Publisher Statement: This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

U2 - 10.1111/1467-8551.12167

DO - 10.1111/1467-8551.12167

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - 550

EP - 566

JO - British Journal of Management

JF - British Journal of Management

SN - 1045-3172

IS - 3

ER -