Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Residence time distributions for turbulent, critical, and laminar pipe flow

  • James Hart
  • , Ian Guymer
  • , Fred Sonnenwald
  • , Virginia Stovin
    • University of Warwick
    • University of Sheffield

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Longitudinal dispersion processes are often described by the advection dispersion equation (ADE), which is analogous to Fick’s law of diffusion, where the impulse response function of the spatial concentration distribution is assumed to be Gaussian. This paper assesses the validity of the assumption of a Gaussian impulse response function, using residence time distributions (RTDs) obtained from new laboratory data. Measured up- and downstream temporal concentration profiles have been deconvolved to numerically infer RTDs for a range of turbulent, critical, and laminar pipe flows. It is shown that the Gaussian impulse response function provides a good estimate of the system’s mixing characteristics for turbulent and critical flows, and an empirical equation to estimate the dispersion coefficient for the Reynolds number, RR, between 3,000 and 20,000 is presented. For laminar flow, here identified as R<3,000R<3,000, the RTDs do not conform to the Gaussian assumption because of insufficient available time for the solute to become cross-sectionally well mixed. For this situation, which occurs commonly in water distribution networks, a theoretical RTD for laminar flow that assumes no radial mixing is shown to provide a good approximation of the system’s mixing characteristics at short times after injection.
    Original languageEnglish
    Article number04016024
    Number of pages10
    Journal Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, ASCE
    Volume142
    Issue number9
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 4 May 2016

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Residence time distributions for turbulent, critical, and laminar pipe flow'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this