Reliability of the audit committee in weak institutional environments: Evidence from Nigeria

Folajimi Ashiru, Emmanuel Adegbite, Jane Frecknall-Hughes, Olabisi Daodu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Relying on institutional theory, this article presents external stakeholders’ perspectives on the factors that influence audit committees’ independence and reliability in a weak institutional context. We conducted 37 semi-structured interviews with two critical external stakeholder groups (27 experienced professional investors and 10 senior regulatory officials) in the Nigerian banking sector. Our study finds that the independence of audit committee members, being an ‘a posteriori’ rather than an ‘a priori’ accountability verification, bears institutional contextual bias. Consequently, we unpack five factors (allegiance to the dominant owner; poor professional conduct; corruption; nepotism and opportunism; and impunity) that influence external stakeholders’ perception of the reliability of the audit committee’s independence in Nigeria.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)(In-Press)
JournalJournal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation
Volume(In-Press)
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 2024

Keywords

  • Audit committee
  • independence
  • accountability
  • external stakeholders
  • Nigeria

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reliability of the audit committee in weak institutional environments: Evidence from Nigeria'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this