Relational processing demands and the role of spatial context in the construction of episodic simulations

Kristina Wiebels, Donna Rose Addis, David Moreau, Valerie van Mulukom, Kelsey Onderdijk, Reece Roberts

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    16 Citations (Scopus)
    140 Downloads (Pure)


    Reports on differences between remembering the past and imagining the future have led to the hypothesis that constructing future events is a more cognitively demanding process. However, factors that influence these increased demands, such as whether the event has been previously constructed and the types of details comprising the event, have remained relatively unexplored. Across two experiments, we examined how these factors influence the process of constructing event representations by having participants repeatedly construct events and measuring how construction times and a range of phenomenological ratings changed across time points. In Experiment 1, we contrasted the construction of past and future events and found that, relative to past events, the constructive demands associated with future events are particularly heightened when these events are imagined for the first time. Across repeated simulations, future events became increasingly similar to past events in terms of construction times and incorporated detail. In Experiment 2, participants imagined future events involving two memory details (person, location) and then reimagined the event either (a) exactly the same, (b) with a different person, or (c) in a different location. We predicted that if generating spatial information is particularly important for event construction, a change in location will have the greatest impact on constructive demands. Results showed that spatial context contributed to these heightened constructive demands more so than person details, consistent with theories highlighting the central role of spatial processing in episodic simulation. We discuss the findings from both studies in the light of relational processing demands and consider implications for current theoretical frameworks.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1424-1441
    Number of pages18
    JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
    Issue number8
    Early online date5 Mar 2020
    Publication statusPublished - Aug 2020

    Bibliographical note

    "©American Psychological Association, 2020. This paper is not the copy of record and may not exactly replicate the authoritative document published in the APA journal. Please do not copy or cite without author's permission. The final article is available, upon publication, at: 10.1037/xlm0000831


    • Imagination
    • repetition
    • future thinking
    • cognitive processing
    • Future thinking
    • Bayesian modeling
    • Autobiographical memory
    • Scene construction

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
    • Language and Linguistics
    • Linguistics and Language

    Cite this