(Re)imagining Magna Carta: Myth, Metaphor and the Rhetoric of Britishness

Judi Atkins

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)
84 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The 800th anniversary of Magna Carta came at a time of growing uncertainty about what it means to be British. Contemporary politicians have responded by articulating visions of Britishness, through which they seek to unite citizens behind a common identity. Taking as its focus the myth of Magna Carta, this article examines the rhetoric of Britishness of Gordon Brown and David Cameron. It shows that although both link Magna Carta to the myth of British exceptionalism, Cameron alone defines Britishness against an external ‘Other’. The article also demonstrates that Magna Carta acts as a ‘founding myth’, and that its emergence as such is indicative of a change in Britain’s ‘rhetorical culture’.

Publisher Statement: This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication in Parliamentary Affairs following peer review. The version of record Atkins, J 2015, '(Re)imagining Magna Carta: Myth, Metaphor and the Rhetoric of Britishness' Parliamentary Affairs, vol 69, no. 3, pp. 603-620 is available online at: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsv057
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)603-620
Number of pages18
JournalParliamentary Affairs
Volume69
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Nov 2015

Bibliographical note

This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication in Parliamentary Affairs following peer review. The version of record Atkins, J 2015, '(Re)imagining Magna Carta: Myth, Metaphor and the Rhetoric of Britishness' Parliamentary Affairs, vol 69, no. 3, pp. 603-620 is available online at: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsv057

Keywords

  • Britishness
  • British political speech
  • epideictic rhetoric
  • exceptionalism
  • myth
  • national identity

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '(Re)imagining Magna Carta: Myth, Metaphor and the Rhetoric of Britishness'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this