Abstract
Much interest has been paid to the implementation of early rehabilitation within the intensive care unit (ICU). With muscle mass losses of 2% for each day of inactivity (Fazzini et al., 2023), delays to the initiation of rehabilitation increases the likelihood of patients experiencing significant physical and non-physical morbidity. There remains a lack of clarity on what ‘early’ really means, with previous studies of early rehabilitation demonstrating the time to first mobilise ranging from 1 to 13 days (Schweickert et al., 2009, Schaller et al., 2016, McWilliams et al., 2021). Due to the heterogeneity of patients admitted to ICU, from a variety of clinical specialities, with a range of comorbidities and pre-existing health states, the answer becomes more complex than a simple time-point. As recently demonstrated by the TEAM trial (Hodgson et al., 2022), too strong a focus on ‘starting early’ with the singular aim of achieving the highest mobility level for the longest duration possible, potentially without the correct clinical context, may tip the scales towards risk over clinical benefit. Instead, it is essential the initiation of rehabilitation is based on consideration of physiological stability, which for some patients may well not occur within the first week or even two of their ICU admission (McWilliams et al, 2021).
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 103404 |
Number of pages | 3 |
Journal | Intensive & critical care nursing |
Volume | 77 |
Early online date | 4 Feb 2023 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Aug 2023 |
Bibliographical note
Copyright © and Moral Rights are retained by the author(s) and/ or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This item cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder(s). The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.This document is the author’s post-print version, incorporating any revisions agreed during the peer-review process. Some differences between the published version and this version may remain and you are advised to consult the published version if you wish to cite from it.