Regionalising higher education for repositioning Southeast Asia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) has led the way in constructing the East Asian region with China, Japan, and South Korea, and an inter-regional entity with the European Union (EU)—known as the Asia–Europe Meeting (ASEM). The initial aims were security and trade. Recently, however, higher education has been brought into these regionalising processes, largely as a response to the globalising of neoliberalism. The paper argues that regions are social, economic, and political constructions shaped by both material forces and cultural factors. It emphasises the importance of the latter and explains three mechanisms at work: harmonisation to build intra-ASEAN higher education cooperation; socialisation to create the ASEAN+3 region; and mutual learning to engage with the EU in shaping an ‘ASEM Education Area’. These mechanisms influence the ways in which regional actors form new conceptions of self and other, negotiate norms, and (re)construct their identities and interests, thus creating new forms of cooperation and community. Particularly, mutual learning generates the outcome of a deeper negotiation for an equal partnership between the ‘Asia’ and the ‘Europe’ in ASEM. Hence, higher education regionalism emerges as a way to reposition Southeast Asia.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)417-432
Number of pages16
JournalOxford Review of Education
Volume43
Issue number4
Early online date27 Jul 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Fingerprint

Southeast Asia
ASEAN
education
form of cooperation
Socialisation
regionalism
harmonization
cultural factors
neoliberalism
social economics
South Korea
learning
Japan
China
community

Keywords

  • Regional identity
  • higher education regionalism
  • harmonisation
  • socialisation
  • mutual learning
  • ASEAN

Cite this

Regionalising higher education for repositioning Southeast Asia. / Dang, QueAnh.

In: Oxford Review of Education , Vol. 43, No. 4, 2017, p. 417-432.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3b91007139a6436fb8efbf3d696151c2,
title = "Regionalising higher education for repositioning Southeast Asia",
abstract = "The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) has led the way in constructing the East Asian region with China, Japan, and South Korea, and an inter-regional entity with the European Union (EU)—known as the Asia–Europe Meeting (ASEM). The initial aims were security and trade. Recently, however, higher education has been brought into these regionalising processes, largely as a response to the globalising of neoliberalism. The paper argues that regions are social, economic, and political constructions shaped by both material forces and cultural factors. It emphasises the importance of the latter and explains three mechanisms at work: harmonisation to build intra-ASEAN higher education cooperation; socialisation to create the ASEAN+3 region; and mutual learning to engage with the EU in shaping an ‘ASEM Education Area’. These mechanisms influence the ways in which regional actors form new conceptions of self and other, negotiate norms, and (re)construct their identities and interests, thus creating new forms of cooperation and community. Particularly, mutual learning generates the outcome of a deeper negotiation for an equal partnership between the ‘Asia’ and the ‘Europe’ in ASEM. Hence, higher education regionalism emerges as a way to reposition Southeast Asia.",
keywords = "Regional identity, higher education regionalism, harmonisation, socialisation, mutual learning, ASEAN",
author = "QueAnh Dang",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1080/03054985.2017.1327427",
language = "English",
volume = "43",
pages = "417--432",
journal = "Oxford Review of Education",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Regionalising higher education for repositioning Southeast Asia

AU - Dang, QueAnh

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) has led the way in constructing the East Asian region with China, Japan, and South Korea, and an inter-regional entity with the European Union (EU)—known as the Asia–Europe Meeting (ASEM). The initial aims were security and trade. Recently, however, higher education has been brought into these regionalising processes, largely as a response to the globalising of neoliberalism. The paper argues that regions are social, economic, and political constructions shaped by both material forces and cultural factors. It emphasises the importance of the latter and explains three mechanisms at work: harmonisation to build intra-ASEAN higher education cooperation; socialisation to create the ASEAN+3 region; and mutual learning to engage with the EU in shaping an ‘ASEM Education Area’. These mechanisms influence the ways in which regional actors form new conceptions of self and other, negotiate norms, and (re)construct their identities and interests, thus creating new forms of cooperation and community. Particularly, mutual learning generates the outcome of a deeper negotiation for an equal partnership between the ‘Asia’ and the ‘Europe’ in ASEM. Hence, higher education regionalism emerges as a way to reposition Southeast Asia.

AB - The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) has led the way in constructing the East Asian region with China, Japan, and South Korea, and an inter-regional entity with the European Union (EU)—known as the Asia–Europe Meeting (ASEM). The initial aims were security and trade. Recently, however, higher education has been brought into these regionalising processes, largely as a response to the globalising of neoliberalism. The paper argues that regions are social, economic, and political constructions shaped by both material forces and cultural factors. It emphasises the importance of the latter and explains three mechanisms at work: harmonisation to build intra-ASEAN higher education cooperation; socialisation to create the ASEAN+3 region; and mutual learning to engage with the EU in shaping an ‘ASEM Education Area’. These mechanisms influence the ways in which regional actors form new conceptions of self and other, negotiate norms, and (re)construct their identities and interests, thus creating new forms of cooperation and community. Particularly, mutual learning generates the outcome of a deeper negotiation for an equal partnership between the ‘Asia’ and the ‘Europe’ in ASEM. Hence, higher education regionalism emerges as a way to reposition Southeast Asia.

KW - Regional identity

KW - higher education regionalism

KW - harmonisation

KW - socialisation

KW - mutual learning

KW - ASEAN

U2 - 10.1080/03054985.2017.1327427

DO - 10.1080/03054985.2017.1327427

M3 - Article

VL - 43

SP - 417

EP - 432

JO - Oxford Review of Education

JF - Oxford Review of Education

IS - 4

ER -