Reflecting and Integrating the Contextual Influences of Ambiguities and Institutional Power in Organisational Research Design: A Case of Myanmar

Sandar Win, Alexander Kofinas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)
8 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Our understanding of how an organisation operates is elucidated by the host country's political system. Myanmar has remained abstruse to researchers for many decades, as do most emerging markets prior to their transition from a centrally planned economy to a market economy such as China. We establish how the problematising and contextualisation of the methodologies adopted during longitudinal fieldwork in Myanmar (2008 to 2016) has influenced our research focus and question. By reflecting on our experience of conducting organisational research in a highly institutionalised environment, we have identified limitations in the prevalent research methodologies used by the extant literature. Such methodologies tend to be incompatible with the Asian context. This process of problematisation required us to remain flexible and adaptive during the process of the generation of the research questions. We adopted a context-informed theory-building process and reflect on the interplay between interviewer, interviewees, and local institutional contexts. An important insight from this process was the need to nullify the asymmetry of power between the interviewer and interviewees to obtain honest responses rather than superficial data that aimed to satisfy and please the interviewer/institutional context.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)341-370
Number of pages30
JournalManagement and Organization Review
Volume15
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2019
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Burma
Organizational research
Research design
Methodology
Institutional context
Political system
Emerging markets
Asymmetry
Theory building
Contextualization
Centrally planned economy
Market economy
Asia
China
Host country

Keywords

  • emerging markets
  • institutional theory
  • interview methods
  • qualitative research
  • research methodology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • Strategy and Management

Cite this

@article{56b0efda19384cd49e396c9fe1e54b28,
title = "Reflecting and Integrating the Contextual Influences of Ambiguities and Institutional Power in Organisational Research Design: A Case of Myanmar",
abstract = "Our understanding of how an organisation operates is elucidated by the host country's political system. Myanmar has remained abstruse to researchers for many decades, as do most emerging markets prior to their transition from a centrally planned economy to a market economy such as China. We establish how the problematising and contextualisation of the methodologies adopted during longitudinal fieldwork in Myanmar (2008 to 2016) has influenced our research focus and question. By reflecting on our experience of conducting organisational research in a highly institutionalised environment, we have identified limitations in the prevalent research methodologies used by the extant literature. Such methodologies tend to be incompatible with the Asian context. This process of problematisation required us to remain flexible and adaptive during the process of the generation of the research questions. We adopted a context-informed theory-building process and reflect on the interplay between interviewer, interviewees, and local institutional contexts. An important insight from this process was the need to nullify the asymmetry of power between the interviewer and interviewees to obtain honest responses rather than superficial data that aimed to satisfy and please the interviewer/institutional context.",
keywords = "emerging markets, institutional theory, interview methods, qualitative research, research methodology",
author = "Sandar Win and Alexander Kofinas",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1017/mor.2019.26",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "341--370",
journal = "Management and Organization Review",
issn = "1740-8776",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reflecting and Integrating the Contextual Influences of Ambiguities and Institutional Power in Organisational Research Design

T2 - A Case of Myanmar

AU - Win, Sandar

AU - Kofinas , Alexander

PY - 2019/6

Y1 - 2019/6

N2 - Our understanding of how an organisation operates is elucidated by the host country's political system. Myanmar has remained abstruse to researchers for many decades, as do most emerging markets prior to their transition from a centrally planned economy to a market economy such as China. We establish how the problematising and contextualisation of the methodologies adopted during longitudinal fieldwork in Myanmar (2008 to 2016) has influenced our research focus and question. By reflecting on our experience of conducting organisational research in a highly institutionalised environment, we have identified limitations in the prevalent research methodologies used by the extant literature. Such methodologies tend to be incompatible with the Asian context. This process of problematisation required us to remain flexible and adaptive during the process of the generation of the research questions. We adopted a context-informed theory-building process and reflect on the interplay between interviewer, interviewees, and local institutional contexts. An important insight from this process was the need to nullify the asymmetry of power between the interviewer and interviewees to obtain honest responses rather than superficial data that aimed to satisfy and please the interviewer/institutional context.

AB - Our understanding of how an organisation operates is elucidated by the host country's political system. Myanmar has remained abstruse to researchers for many decades, as do most emerging markets prior to their transition from a centrally planned economy to a market economy such as China. We establish how the problematising and contextualisation of the methodologies adopted during longitudinal fieldwork in Myanmar (2008 to 2016) has influenced our research focus and question. By reflecting on our experience of conducting organisational research in a highly institutionalised environment, we have identified limitations in the prevalent research methodologies used by the extant literature. Such methodologies tend to be incompatible with the Asian context. This process of problematisation required us to remain flexible and adaptive during the process of the generation of the research questions. We adopted a context-informed theory-building process and reflect on the interplay between interviewer, interviewees, and local institutional contexts. An important insight from this process was the need to nullify the asymmetry of power between the interviewer and interviewees to obtain honest responses rather than superficial data that aimed to satisfy and please the interviewer/institutional context.

KW - emerging markets

KW - institutional theory

KW - interview methods

KW - qualitative research

KW - research methodology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068517473&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/mor.2019.26

DO - 10.1017/mor.2019.26

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 341

EP - 370

JO - Management and Organization Review

JF - Management and Organization Review

SN - 1740-8776

IS - 2

ER -