Redacted in Nebraska: the noises of conspiracy around nuclear power problems

J. Eyles, Jana Fried, E. C. Eyles

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    1 Citation (Scopus)


    This paper investigates a ‘small story’, the problems around the Fort Calhoun nuclear power plant (Nebraska) in the wet summer of 2011. Relying on materials from digital media, it presents the official and an alternative version of events. Utilizing a constructionist approach, it identifies the search for moral certainty, as well as the importance of blame and conspiracy theories, from which emerges the ‘big story’. Highlighting the important role of on-line media and digital communication, we document not only the official story but also an opposing version based on a coherent worldview emphasising the problems of big government, liberal views and denial of American individual rights—all framed as a conspiracy covering-up a threatening, human-made technology failure. We suggest why this worldview occurs, stressing a widespread emphasis on American values and history, ‘failed journalism’, public uncertainty, the complexity of nuclear technology, and the specific uses of digital communication.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)329-342
    Issue number3
    Publication statusPublished - Jun 2014

    Bibliographical note

    The full text is currently unavailable on the repository.


    • Nuclear power
    • Conspiracy thinking
    • Small story
    • United State
    • Digital culture
    • Internet-based media


    Dive into the research topics of 'Redacted in Nebraska: the noises of conspiracy around nuclear power problems'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this