Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Recovery from startle and surprise: A survey of airline pilots' operational experience using a startle and surprise management method

  • Daan Vlaskamp
  • , Annemarie Landman
  • , Jeroen van Rooij
  • , James Blundell
  • Coventry University
  • Cranfield University
  • Delft University of Technology
  • Netherlands Aerospace Centre NLR

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

A significant safety challenge airline pilots contend with is the possibility of experiencing startle and surprise. These are cognitive-emotional responses that may temporarily impair performance and that have contributed to multiple fatal loss of control events. Several self-management methods exist that are intended to facilitate recovery from startle and surprise, but these have only been tested in simulator experiments. The current study addresses this research gap by surveying the perceptions of 239 airline pilots on the utility and benefit of a method which they use in operational practice– the “Reset Method”. Overall, the survey results revealed that pilots felt the method improved mental preparedness, and reduced stress. A reported reason for not applying the method was the urge to act quickly. In addition, not all steps of the method were applied equally, and some pilots found the method difficult to fit into the existing procedures of several time-critical scenarios (e.g., aircraft upsets and emergency landings). We recommend training self-management methods in scenarios which carry the most risk of negative effects of startle and surprise. We also recommend instilling awareness of the ‘startle paradox': self-management techniques are most difficult to apply in situations where they are most beneficial. Method shortening and simplification may facilitate application. Future research should focus on refining the method's implementation, addressing the startle paradox, and understanding the transferability of startle and surprise management methods to other safety critical industries defined by complex sociotechnical interactions.

Original languageEnglish
Article number103733
Number of pages8
JournalInternational Journal of Industrial Ergonomics
Volume107
Early online date17 Mar 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2025
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

© 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Under this licence, users are permitted to share, download, copy, and redistribute the material in any medium or format, and—where applicable—adapt or build upon the work, provided they comply with the conditions of the stated licence

Funding

The current research was unfunded and was completed as part of an MSc thesis at Coventry University, UK. We would like to thank the commercial pilots who volunteered their valuable time to support this research

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Crew resource management
  • Pilot decision making
  • Pilot/ crew behaviour
  • Safety
  • Stress

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Human Factors and Ergonomics
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Recovery from startle and surprise: A survey of airline pilots' operational experience using a startle and surprise management method'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this