Reaffirming the importance of managerial discretion in corporate governance: A comment on Andersen (2017)

Moustafa Haj Youssef, Da Teng

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to refute the work of Andersen (2017) by suggesting a different theoretical view and to argue that the concept of managerial discretion is one of the core dimensions that cannot be discarded when studying corporate governance. Design/methodology/approach: This paper uses theoretical frameworks from recent literature, definitions and empirical studies on the concept of managerial discretion and corporate governance. Findings: Several studies have empirically tested and measured the concept of managerial discretion, some have provided validity and reliability of the concept and others have showed the direct impact of discretion on firm performance. Practical implications: Research on managerial discretion provides owners and board of directors a clear advice on how much discretion can be granted to top executives by taking into consideration the different dimensions of the external and internal environment. Originality/value: This paper concludes that corporate governance research will not improve if it abandons the concept of managerial discretion.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)240-254
Number of pages15
JournalCorporate Governance
Volume19
Issue number2
Early online date22 Aug 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2019

Fingerprint

Managerial discretion
Corporate governance
Discretion
Design methodology
Firm performance
Empirical study
Board of directors
Owners
Theoretical framework

Bibliographical note

Copyright © and Moral Rights are retained by the author(s) and/ or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This item cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder(s). The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.

Keywords

  • Corporate governance
  • Institutional antecedents
  • Managerial discretion
  • Organizational performance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Reaffirming the importance of managerial discretion in corporate governance: A comment on Andersen (2017). / Haj Youssef, Moustafa; Teng, Da.

In: Corporate Governance, Vol. 19, No. 2, 01.04.2019, p. 240-254.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{bd1013d3fe5740b6a2774146a03608d6,
title = "Reaffirming the importance of managerial discretion in corporate governance: A comment on Andersen (2017)",
abstract = "Purpose: The purpose of this study is to refute the work of Andersen (2017) by suggesting a different theoretical view and to argue that the concept of managerial discretion is one of the core dimensions that cannot be discarded when studying corporate governance. Design/methodology/approach: This paper uses theoretical frameworks from recent literature, definitions and empirical studies on the concept of managerial discretion and corporate governance. Findings: Several studies have empirically tested and measured the concept of managerial discretion, some have provided validity and reliability of the concept and others have showed the direct impact of discretion on firm performance. Practical implications: Research on managerial discretion provides owners and board of directors a clear advice on how much discretion can be granted to top executives by taking into consideration the different dimensions of the external and internal environment. Originality/value: This paper concludes that corporate governance research will not improve if it abandons the concept of managerial discretion.",
keywords = "Corporate governance, Institutional antecedents, Managerial discretion, Organizational performance",
author = "{Haj Youssef}, Moustafa and Da Teng",
note = "Copyright {\circledC} and Moral Rights are retained by the author(s) and/ or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This item cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder(s). The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1108/CG-05-2018-0172",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "240--254",
journal = "Corporate Governance (Bingley)",
issn = "1472-0701",
publisher = "Emerald",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reaffirming the importance of managerial discretion in corporate governance: A comment on Andersen (2017)

AU - Haj Youssef, Moustafa

AU - Teng, Da

N1 - Copyright © and Moral Rights are retained by the author(s) and/ or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This item cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder(s). The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.

PY - 2019/4/1

Y1 - 2019/4/1

N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this study is to refute the work of Andersen (2017) by suggesting a different theoretical view and to argue that the concept of managerial discretion is one of the core dimensions that cannot be discarded when studying corporate governance. Design/methodology/approach: This paper uses theoretical frameworks from recent literature, definitions and empirical studies on the concept of managerial discretion and corporate governance. Findings: Several studies have empirically tested and measured the concept of managerial discretion, some have provided validity and reliability of the concept and others have showed the direct impact of discretion on firm performance. Practical implications: Research on managerial discretion provides owners and board of directors a clear advice on how much discretion can be granted to top executives by taking into consideration the different dimensions of the external and internal environment. Originality/value: This paper concludes that corporate governance research will not improve if it abandons the concept of managerial discretion.

AB - Purpose: The purpose of this study is to refute the work of Andersen (2017) by suggesting a different theoretical view and to argue that the concept of managerial discretion is one of the core dimensions that cannot be discarded when studying corporate governance. Design/methodology/approach: This paper uses theoretical frameworks from recent literature, definitions and empirical studies on the concept of managerial discretion and corporate governance. Findings: Several studies have empirically tested and measured the concept of managerial discretion, some have provided validity and reliability of the concept and others have showed the direct impact of discretion on firm performance. Practical implications: Research on managerial discretion provides owners and board of directors a clear advice on how much discretion can be granted to top executives by taking into consideration the different dimensions of the external and internal environment. Originality/value: This paper concludes that corporate governance research will not improve if it abandons the concept of managerial discretion.

KW - Corporate governance

KW - Institutional antecedents

KW - Managerial discretion

KW - Organizational performance

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054883158&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/CG-05-2018-0172

DO - 10.1108/CG-05-2018-0172

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 240

EP - 254

JO - Corporate Governance (Bingley)

JF - Corporate Governance (Bingley)

SN - 1472-0701

IS - 2

ER -