Re-examining the BMW-Rover affair: a case study of corporate, strategic and government failure?

A. De Ruyter, David Bailey

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    3 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This paper analyses corporate and government strategies during the purchase, period of control and divestment by BMW of the car manufacturer Rover over the period 1994 to 2000. This paper examines three types of 'failure'. It views BMW's purchase of Rover as a 'corporate failure', with British Aerospace keen to sell Rover to raise cash and with BMW not realising the real condition of Rover. It then moves on to examine BMW's 'divide and rule' strategies with regard to working conditions and subsidy-seeking and its decision to sell Rover as an example of 'strategic failure'. Finally, it considers the 'hands-off' nature of British policy towards such transnational firms, and BMW in particular, as an example of 'government failure'. This paper concludes by raising the possibility of an EU-wide policy towards transnationals, especially in terms of monitoring the activities of such firms
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)117-136
    JournalInternational Journal of Automotive Technology and Management
    Volume12
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2012

    Fingerprint

    Railroad cars
    Monitoring
    Purchase
    Government failure
    Car manufacturers
    Government
    Aerospace
    Cash
    Divestment
    Subsidies
    Corporate failure
    Working conditions

    Bibliographical note

    The full text is not available from the repository.

    Keywords

    • BMW
    • Rover
    • takeover
    • disinvestment
    • transnationals
    • strategic failure
    • monitoring
    • corporate failure
    • government failure
    • automobile industry
    • automotive manufacturing
    • UK
    • United Kingdom
    • government policy

    Cite this

    Re-examining the BMW-Rover affair: a case study of corporate, strategic and government failure? / De Ruyter, A.; Bailey, David.

    In: International Journal of Automotive Technology and Management, Vol. 12, No. 2, 2012, p. 117-136.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{5c988a47a0b04d06b9b328db1e9f6a93,
    title = "Re-examining the BMW-Rover affair: a case study of corporate, strategic and government failure?",
    abstract = "This paper analyses corporate and government strategies during the purchase, period of control and divestment by BMW of the car manufacturer Rover over the period 1994 to 2000. This paper examines three types of 'failure'. It views BMW's purchase of Rover as a 'corporate failure', with British Aerospace keen to sell Rover to raise cash and with BMW not realising the real condition of Rover. It then moves on to examine BMW's 'divide and rule' strategies with regard to working conditions and subsidy-seeking and its decision to sell Rover as an example of 'strategic failure'. Finally, it considers the 'hands-off' nature of British policy towards such transnational firms, and BMW in particular, as an example of 'government failure'. This paper concludes by raising the possibility of an EU-wide policy towards transnationals, especially in terms of monitoring the activities of such firms",
    keywords = "BMW, Rover, takeover, disinvestment, transnationals, strategic failure, monitoring, corporate failure, government failure, automobile industry, automotive manufacturing, UK, United Kingdom, government policy",
    author = "{De Ruyter}, A. and David Bailey",
    note = "The full text is not available from the repository.",
    year = "2012",
    doi = "10.1504/IJATM.2012.046858",
    language = "English",
    volume = "12",
    pages = "117--136",
    journal = "International Journal of Automotive Technology and Management",
    issn = "1470-9511",
    publisher = "Inderscience",
    number = "2",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Re-examining the BMW-Rover affair: a case study of corporate, strategic and government failure?

    AU - De Ruyter, A.

    AU - Bailey, David

    N1 - The full text is not available from the repository.

    PY - 2012

    Y1 - 2012

    N2 - This paper analyses corporate and government strategies during the purchase, period of control and divestment by BMW of the car manufacturer Rover over the period 1994 to 2000. This paper examines three types of 'failure'. It views BMW's purchase of Rover as a 'corporate failure', with British Aerospace keen to sell Rover to raise cash and with BMW not realising the real condition of Rover. It then moves on to examine BMW's 'divide and rule' strategies with regard to working conditions and subsidy-seeking and its decision to sell Rover as an example of 'strategic failure'. Finally, it considers the 'hands-off' nature of British policy towards such transnational firms, and BMW in particular, as an example of 'government failure'. This paper concludes by raising the possibility of an EU-wide policy towards transnationals, especially in terms of monitoring the activities of such firms

    AB - This paper analyses corporate and government strategies during the purchase, period of control and divestment by BMW of the car manufacturer Rover over the period 1994 to 2000. This paper examines three types of 'failure'. It views BMW's purchase of Rover as a 'corporate failure', with British Aerospace keen to sell Rover to raise cash and with BMW not realising the real condition of Rover. It then moves on to examine BMW's 'divide and rule' strategies with regard to working conditions and subsidy-seeking and its decision to sell Rover as an example of 'strategic failure'. Finally, it considers the 'hands-off' nature of British policy towards such transnational firms, and BMW in particular, as an example of 'government failure'. This paper concludes by raising the possibility of an EU-wide policy towards transnationals, especially in terms of monitoring the activities of such firms

    KW - BMW

    KW - Rover

    KW - takeover

    KW - disinvestment

    KW - transnationals

    KW - strategic failure

    KW - monitoring

    KW - corporate failure

    KW - government failure

    KW - automobile industry

    KW - automotive manufacturing

    KW - UK

    KW - United Kingdom

    KW - government policy

    U2 - 10.1504/IJATM.2012.046858

    DO - 10.1504/IJATM.2012.046858

    M3 - Article

    VL - 12

    SP - 117

    EP - 136

    JO - International Journal of Automotive Technology and Management

    JF - International Journal of Automotive Technology and Management

    SN - 1470-9511

    IS - 2

    ER -