Random glucose GWAS in 493,036 individuals provides insights into diabetes pathophysiology, complications and treatment stratification

Meta-Analysis of Glucose and Insulin-related Traits Consortium (MAGIC)

Research output: Working paper/PreprintPreprint

13 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Homeostatic control of blood glucose requires different physiological responses in the fasting and post-prandial states. We reasoned that glucose measurements under non-standardised conditions (random glucose; RG) may capture diverse glucoregulatory processes more effectively than previous genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of fasting glycaemia or after standardised glucose loads. Through GWAS meta-analysis of RG in 493,036 individuals without diabetes of diverse ethnicities we identified 128 associated loci represented by 162 distinct signals, including 14 with sex-dimorphic effects, 9 discovered through trans-ethnic analysis, and 70 novel signals for glycaemic traits. Novel RG loci were particularly enriched in expression in the ileum and colon, indicating a prominent role for the gastrointestinal tract in the control of blood glucose. Functional studies and molecular dynamics simulations of coding variants of GLP1R, a well-established type 2 diabetes treatment target, provided a genetic framework for optimal selection of GLP-1R agonist therapy. We also provided new evidence from Mendelian randomisation that lung function is modulated by blood glucose and that pulmonary dysfunction is a diabetes complication. Thus, our approach based on RG GWAS provided wide-ranging insights into the biology of glucose regulation, diabetes complications and the potential for treatment
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages60
DOIs
Publication statusSubmitted - 2023

Publication series

NameNature Genetics
PublisherNature Publishing Group
ISSN (Print)1061-4036

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Random glucose GWAS in 493,036 individuals provides insights into diabetes pathophysiology, complications and treatment stratification'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this