R&D consortia as boundary organisations: misalignment and asymmetry of boundary management

Omid Omidvar, R. Kislov

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    2 Citations (Scopus)
    6 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    The paper presents a qualitative multiple case study of three multilateral public–private R&D consortia representing different industrial sectors. Using the practice-based view as a theoretical lens, we explore the interplay between the deliberate and emergent practices of boundary management across the following three dimensions: (1) Boundary bridging focus; (2) boundary crossing arrangements; and (3) collaborative governance arrangements. Drawing on interviews, documentary analysis and observational data, we describe the misalignment between the deliberate and emergent aspects of boundary management, which can be caused by the funders' reporting requirements, power differentials between collaborators and lack of contextual understanding. These factors, accompanied by path-dependency and confidentiality issues, may result in asymmetrical boundary management, whereby a selective focus on a specific boundary (or set of boundaries) combined with an unequal development of boundary bridges within the collaboration may lead to the crossing of some boundaries being prioritised at the expense of others.
    Original languageEnglish
    Article number1650030
    JournalInternational Journal of Innovation Management
    Volume20
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 12 Aug 2015

    Fingerprint

    Lenses
    Asymmetry
    Consortium
    Misalignment
    Boundary management
    Expenses
    Path dependency
    Confidentiality
    Multiple case study
    Boundary crossing
    Governance
    Factors
    Industrial sector

    Bibliographical note

    Electronic version of an article published as International Journal of Innovation Management, 20, 2015, 1650030, 10.1142/S1363919616500304 © copyright World Scientific Publishing Company http://www.worldscientific.com/worldscinet/ijim

    Keywords

    • R&D consortia
    • boundaries
    • boundary organisations
    • boundary management
    • boundary organising
    • practice-based view
    • strategy
    • collaboration

    Cite this

    R&D consortia as boundary organisations: misalignment and asymmetry of boundary management. / Omidvar, Omid; Kislov, R.

    In: International Journal of Innovation Management, Vol. 20, 1650030, 12.08.2015.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{0058a3f1daf54e6298c4c895fbd3e88a,
    title = "R&D consortia as boundary organisations: misalignment and asymmetry of boundary management",
    abstract = "The paper presents a qualitative multiple case study of three multilateral public–private R&D consortia representing different industrial sectors. Using the practice-based view as a theoretical lens, we explore the interplay between the deliberate and emergent practices of boundary management across the following three dimensions: (1) Boundary bridging focus; (2) boundary crossing arrangements; and (3) collaborative governance arrangements. Drawing on interviews, documentary analysis and observational data, we describe the misalignment between the deliberate and emergent aspects of boundary management, which can be caused by the funders' reporting requirements, power differentials between collaborators and lack of contextual understanding. These factors, accompanied by path-dependency and confidentiality issues, may result in asymmetrical boundary management, whereby a selective focus on a specific boundary (or set of boundaries) combined with an unequal development of boundary bridges within the collaboration may lead to the crossing of some boundaries being prioritised at the expense of others.",
    keywords = "R&D consortia, boundaries, boundary organisations, boundary management, boundary organising, practice-based view, strategy, collaboration",
    author = "Omid Omidvar and R. Kislov",
    note = "Electronic version of an article published as International Journal of Innovation Management, 20, 2015, 1650030, 10.1142/S1363919616500304 {\circledC} copyright World Scientific Publishing Company http://www.worldscientific.com/worldscinet/ijim",
    year = "2015",
    month = "8",
    day = "12",
    doi = "10.1142/S1363919616500304",
    language = "English",
    volume = "20",
    journal = "International Journal of Innovation Management",
    issn = "1363-9196",
    publisher = "Imperial College Press",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - R&D consortia as boundary organisations: misalignment and asymmetry of boundary management

    AU - Omidvar, Omid

    AU - Kislov, R.

    N1 - Electronic version of an article published as International Journal of Innovation Management, 20, 2015, 1650030, 10.1142/S1363919616500304 © copyright World Scientific Publishing Company http://www.worldscientific.com/worldscinet/ijim

    PY - 2015/8/12

    Y1 - 2015/8/12

    N2 - The paper presents a qualitative multiple case study of three multilateral public–private R&D consortia representing different industrial sectors. Using the practice-based view as a theoretical lens, we explore the interplay between the deliberate and emergent practices of boundary management across the following three dimensions: (1) Boundary bridging focus; (2) boundary crossing arrangements; and (3) collaborative governance arrangements. Drawing on interviews, documentary analysis and observational data, we describe the misalignment between the deliberate and emergent aspects of boundary management, which can be caused by the funders' reporting requirements, power differentials between collaborators and lack of contextual understanding. These factors, accompanied by path-dependency and confidentiality issues, may result in asymmetrical boundary management, whereby a selective focus on a specific boundary (or set of boundaries) combined with an unequal development of boundary bridges within the collaboration may lead to the crossing of some boundaries being prioritised at the expense of others.

    AB - The paper presents a qualitative multiple case study of three multilateral public–private R&D consortia representing different industrial sectors. Using the practice-based view as a theoretical lens, we explore the interplay between the deliberate and emergent practices of boundary management across the following three dimensions: (1) Boundary bridging focus; (2) boundary crossing arrangements; and (3) collaborative governance arrangements. Drawing on interviews, documentary analysis and observational data, we describe the misalignment between the deliberate and emergent aspects of boundary management, which can be caused by the funders' reporting requirements, power differentials between collaborators and lack of contextual understanding. These factors, accompanied by path-dependency and confidentiality issues, may result in asymmetrical boundary management, whereby a selective focus on a specific boundary (or set of boundaries) combined with an unequal development of boundary bridges within the collaboration may lead to the crossing of some boundaries being prioritised at the expense of others.

    KW - R&D consortia

    KW - boundaries

    KW - boundary organisations

    KW - boundary management

    KW - boundary organising

    KW - practice-based view

    KW - strategy

    KW - collaboration

    U2 - 10.1142/S1363919616500304

    DO - 10.1142/S1363919616500304

    M3 - Article

    VL - 20

    JO - International Journal of Innovation Management

    JF - International Journal of Innovation Management

    SN - 1363-9196

    M1 - 1650030

    ER -