Quasi-static and dynamic testing of splitting, expansion and expansion-splitting hybrid tubes under oblique loading

C. Moreno, R. Beaumont, D.J. Hughes, T. Williams, R. Dashwood

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Railway vehicles energy absorbers are required to comply with the BS EN 15227. These standards require the energy absorbers to dissipate the collision energy while preventing overriding, which implies resisting any vertical loads during the collision. Unlike crumple columns, ‘flat topped’ energy absorbers exhibit an increased axial mean load under oblique loading conditions, instead of decreasing their energy absorption capacity when subjected to a critical transverse loading.

A newly proposed methodology of assessing the oblique loading performance of ‘flat topped’ is presented here to compare the performance of the splitting, expansion and the novel expansion-splitting tubes (all ‘flat topped’ energy absorbers). The methodology comprises the comparison of the measured axial mean load between purely axial tests and oblique loading tests, to assess the sensitivity of the tubes to the oblique loading.

Dimensionally scaled tubes, compressed by expansion, splitting and expansion splitting dies, were quasi-statically and dynamically tested against 5° and 10° inclined plates to reproduce the oblique loading conditions.

The quasi-static results showed that the expansion-splitting tubes, unlike splitting and expansion, were largely insensitive to the application of a transverse loading. Therefore, the expansion-splitting tubes could be regarded as more efficient than expansion or splitting tubes under quasi-static oblique loading.

The dynamic results showed that the splitting tubes became as insensitive as the expansion-splitting tubes to the application of a transverse loading.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)117-130
Number of pages14
JournalInternational Journal of Impact Engineering
Volume100
Early online date2 Nov 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2017

Fingerprint

Testing
Energy absorption

Keywords

  • Splitting
  • Expansion
  • Oblique loading
  • Quasi-static test
  • Dynamic test

Cite this

Quasi-static and dynamic testing of splitting, expansion and expansion-splitting hybrid tubes under oblique loading. / Moreno, C.; Beaumont, R.; Hughes, D.J.; Williams, T.; Dashwood, R.

In: International Journal of Impact Engineering, Vol. 100, 02.2017, p. 117-130.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{03d4c667cf0e40f8b962aa1a5faabbd0,
title = "Quasi-static and dynamic testing of splitting, expansion and expansion-splitting hybrid tubes under oblique loading",
abstract = "Railway vehicles energy absorbers are required to comply with the BS EN 15227. These standards require the energy absorbers to dissipate the collision energy while preventing overriding, which implies resisting any vertical loads during the collision. Unlike crumple columns, ‘flat topped’ energy absorbers exhibit an increased axial mean load under oblique loading conditions, instead of decreasing their energy absorption capacity when subjected to a critical transverse loading.A newly proposed methodology of assessing the oblique loading performance of ‘flat topped’ is presented here to compare the performance of the splitting, expansion and the novel expansion-splitting tubes (all ‘flat topped’ energy absorbers). The methodology comprises the comparison of the measured axial mean load between purely axial tests and oblique loading tests, to assess the sensitivity of the tubes to the oblique loading.Dimensionally scaled tubes, compressed by expansion, splitting and expansion splitting dies, were quasi-statically and dynamically tested against 5° and 10° inclined plates to reproduce the oblique loading conditions.The quasi-static results showed that the expansion-splitting tubes, unlike splitting and expansion, were largely insensitive to the application of a transverse loading. Therefore, the expansion-splitting tubes could be regarded as more efficient than expansion or splitting tubes under quasi-static oblique loading.The dynamic results showed that the splitting tubes became as insensitive as the expansion-splitting tubes to the application of a transverse loading.",
keywords = "Splitting, Expansion, Oblique loading, Quasi-static test, Dynamic test",
author = "C. Moreno and R. Beaumont and D.J. Hughes and T. Williams and R. Dashwood",
year = "2017",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2016.11.001",
language = "English",
volume = "100",
pages = "117--130",
journal = "International Journal of Impact Engineering",
issn = "0734-743X",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quasi-static and dynamic testing of splitting, expansion and expansion-splitting hybrid tubes under oblique loading

AU - Moreno, C.

AU - Beaumont, R.

AU - Hughes, D.J.

AU - Williams, T.

AU - Dashwood, R.

PY - 2017/2

Y1 - 2017/2

N2 - Railway vehicles energy absorbers are required to comply with the BS EN 15227. These standards require the energy absorbers to dissipate the collision energy while preventing overriding, which implies resisting any vertical loads during the collision. Unlike crumple columns, ‘flat topped’ energy absorbers exhibit an increased axial mean load under oblique loading conditions, instead of decreasing their energy absorption capacity when subjected to a critical transverse loading.A newly proposed methodology of assessing the oblique loading performance of ‘flat topped’ is presented here to compare the performance of the splitting, expansion and the novel expansion-splitting tubes (all ‘flat topped’ energy absorbers). The methodology comprises the comparison of the measured axial mean load between purely axial tests and oblique loading tests, to assess the sensitivity of the tubes to the oblique loading.Dimensionally scaled tubes, compressed by expansion, splitting and expansion splitting dies, were quasi-statically and dynamically tested against 5° and 10° inclined plates to reproduce the oblique loading conditions.The quasi-static results showed that the expansion-splitting tubes, unlike splitting and expansion, were largely insensitive to the application of a transverse loading. Therefore, the expansion-splitting tubes could be regarded as more efficient than expansion or splitting tubes under quasi-static oblique loading.The dynamic results showed that the splitting tubes became as insensitive as the expansion-splitting tubes to the application of a transverse loading.

AB - Railway vehicles energy absorbers are required to comply with the BS EN 15227. These standards require the energy absorbers to dissipate the collision energy while preventing overriding, which implies resisting any vertical loads during the collision. Unlike crumple columns, ‘flat topped’ energy absorbers exhibit an increased axial mean load under oblique loading conditions, instead of decreasing their energy absorption capacity when subjected to a critical transverse loading.A newly proposed methodology of assessing the oblique loading performance of ‘flat topped’ is presented here to compare the performance of the splitting, expansion and the novel expansion-splitting tubes (all ‘flat topped’ energy absorbers). The methodology comprises the comparison of the measured axial mean load between purely axial tests and oblique loading tests, to assess the sensitivity of the tubes to the oblique loading.Dimensionally scaled tubes, compressed by expansion, splitting and expansion splitting dies, were quasi-statically and dynamically tested against 5° and 10° inclined plates to reproduce the oblique loading conditions.The quasi-static results showed that the expansion-splitting tubes, unlike splitting and expansion, were largely insensitive to the application of a transverse loading. Therefore, the expansion-splitting tubes could be regarded as more efficient than expansion or splitting tubes under quasi-static oblique loading.The dynamic results showed that the splitting tubes became as insensitive as the expansion-splitting tubes to the application of a transverse loading.

KW - Splitting

KW - Expansion

KW - Oblique loading

KW - Quasi-static test

KW - Dynamic test

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2016.11.001

DO - 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2016.11.001

M3 - Article

VL - 100

SP - 117

EP - 130

JO - International Journal of Impact Engineering

JF - International Journal of Impact Engineering

SN - 0734-743X

ER -