Pyramids or Sandcastles? Regulating police conduct in Ireland

Brian Moss

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Responsive regulation advances the idea that overseers should act cautiously against misconduct, imposing increasingly harsher methods in a phased approach depending on the response of the errant actor. Responsive regulation is assessed here in relation to the Irish policing model since 2007, seeking to determine whether it has been and remains a suitable way to deal with police misconduct that has emerged time and again in that jurisdiction. Using complaint data, it is argued that police overseer treatment of low-level and serious misconduct has not met the expectations of responsive regulation. Further, there has been no evident police commitment to distinguish praiseworthy police officer performance in line with a later version of responsive regulation. Both issues have implications for retention of responsive regulation as a guiding theory for continued police oversight and reform.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)(In-press)
Number of pages18
JournalPolicing and Society
Volume(in-press)
Early online date10 Jul 2019
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 10 Jul 2019

Fingerprint

Ireland
police
regulation
police officer
complaint
jurisdiction
commitment
reform
performance

Keywords

  • Ireland
  • Responsive regulation
  • conduct
  • police

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Law

Cite this

Pyramids or Sandcastles? Regulating police conduct in Ireland. / Moss, Brian.

In: Policing and Society, Vol. (in-press), 10.07.2019, p. (In-press).

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Moss, Brian. / Pyramids or Sandcastles? Regulating police conduct in Ireland. In: Policing and Society. 2019 ; Vol. (in-press). pp. (In-press).
@article{159dc83678cc4d5ea6d8b3a5178fd167,
title = "Pyramids or Sandcastles? Regulating police conduct in Ireland",
abstract = "Responsive regulation advances the idea that overseers should act cautiously against misconduct, imposing increasingly harsher methods in a phased approach depending on the response of the errant actor. Responsive regulation is assessed here in relation to the Irish policing model since 2007, seeking to determine whether it has been and remains a suitable way to deal with police misconduct that has emerged time and again in that jurisdiction. Using complaint data, it is argued that police overseer treatment of low-level and serious misconduct has not met the expectations of responsive regulation. Further, there has been no evident police commitment to distinguish praiseworthy police officer performance in line with a later version of responsive regulation. Both issues have implications for retention of responsive regulation as a guiding theory for continued police oversight and reform.",
keywords = "Ireland, Responsive regulation, conduct, police",
author = "Brian Moss",
year = "2019",
month = "7",
day = "10",
doi = "10.1080/10439463.2019.1640221",
language = "English",
volume = "(in-press)",
pages = "(In--press)",
journal = "Policing and Society",
issn = "1043-9463",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pyramids or Sandcastles? Regulating police conduct in Ireland

AU - Moss, Brian

PY - 2019/7/10

Y1 - 2019/7/10

N2 - Responsive regulation advances the idea that overseers should act cautiously against misconduct, imposing increasingly harsher methods in a phased approach depending on the response of the errant actor. Responsive regulation is assessed here in relation to the Irish policing model since 2007, seeking to determine whether it has been and remains a suitable way to deal with police misconduct that has emerged time and again in that jurisdiction. Using complaint data, it is argued that police overseer treatment of low-level and serious misconduct has not met the expectations of responsive regulation. Further, there has been no evident police commitment to distinguish praiseworthy police officer performance in line with a later version of responsive regulation. Both issues have implications for retention of responsive regulation as a guiding theory for continued police oversight and reform.

AB - Responsive regulation advances the idea that overseers should act cautiously against misconduct, imposing increasingly harsher methods in a phased approach depending on the response of the errant actor. Responsive regulation is assessed here in relation to the Irish policing model since 2007, seeking to determine whether it has been and remains a suitable way to deal with police misconduct that has emerged time and again in that jurisdiction. Using complaint data, it is argued that police overseer treatment of low-level and serious misconduct has not met the expectations of responsive regulation. Further, there has been no evident police commitment to distinguish praiseworthy police officer performance in line with a later version of responsive regulation. Both issues have implications for retention of responsive regulation as a guiding theory for continued police oversight and reform.

KW - Ireland

KW - Responsive regulation

KW - conduct

KW - police

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068766724&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10439463.2019.1640221

DO - 10.1080/10439463.2019.1640221

M3 - Article

VL - (in-press)

SP - (In-press)

JO - Policing and Society

JF - Policing and Society

SN - 1043-9463

ER -