Public Diplomacy and the International Paralympic Committee: reconciling the roles of disability advocate and sports regulator

A. Beacom, Ian Brittain

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)
34 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

While the link between international diplomacy and the Olympic movement has been the subject of extensive academic and journalistic inquiry, the experience of diplomatic discourse as it relates to the relatively youthful Paralympic movement, has received little attention. This is not just in the context of state diplomacy, where for example the Paralympic Games may provide a conduit for the pursuit of specific policy objectives, but also in relation to the engagement of the International Paralympic Committee (IPC) as an evolving non-state actor, in the diplomatic process. The idea of the IPC as an advocacy body engaged through public diplomacy in promoting disability rights is explored as an element of the contemporary politics of disability. The paper considers the relationship between the activities of the IPC and wider lobbying by disabled people’s organizations (DPOs) as a means of leveraging change in domestic and international policy toward disability. In relation to the global development agenda, the paper assesses IPC responses to the gulf in resourcing for parasport (as well as more fundamental health and education services) between high and low resource regions. It suggests that the asymmetry between national teams, evident in levels of representation and podium success at Parasports events presents a challenge to the legitimacy of the IPC as an international advocate for disability rights. It considers the response of the organization from the perspective of public diplomacy and locates that response within the wider diplomacy of development.
This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Diplomacy & Statecraft on 10 May 2016, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/09592296.2016.1169795
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)273-294
JournalDiplomacy & Statecraft
Volume27
Issue number2
Early online date10 May 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

diplomacy
Sports
disability
Public Diplomacy
asymmetry
Diplomacy
legitimacy
organization
politics
event
discourse
health
resources
education
experience

Bibliographical note

Due to the publisher's policy, the full text of this item will not be available from the repository until 10th November 2017.

Keywords

  • international diplomacy
  • Olympic movement
  • Paralympics

Cite this

@article{4cdb2526432c4bfca94a6c3650fdf750,
title = "Public Diplomacy and the International Paralympic Committee: reconciling the roles of disability advocate and sports regulator",
abstract = "While the link between international diplomacy and the Olympic movement has been the subject of extensive academic and journalistic inquiry, the experience of diplomatic discourse as it relates to the relatively youthful Paralympic movement, has received little attention. This is not just in the context of state diplomacy, where for example the Paralympic Games may provide a conduit for the pursuit of specific policy objectives, but also in relation to the engagement of the International Paralympic Committee (IPC) as an evolving non-state actor, in the diplomatic process. The idea of the IPC as an advocacy body engaged through public diplomacy in promoting disability rights is explored as an element of the contemporary politics of disability. The paper considers the relationship between the activities of the IPC and wider lobbying by disabled people’s organizations (DPOs) as a means of leveraging change in domestic and international policy toward disability. In relation to the global development agenda, the paper assesses IPC responses to the gulf in resourcing for parasport (as well as more fundamental health and education services) between high and low resource regions. It suggests that the asymmetry between national teams, evident in levels of representation and podium success at Parasports events presents a challenge to the legitimacy of the IPC as an international advocate for disability rights. It considers the response of the organization from the perspective of public diplomacy and locates that response within the wider diplomacy of development.This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Diplomacy & Statecraft on 10 May 2016, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/09592296.2016.1169795",
keywords = "international diplomacy, Olympic movement, Paralympics",
author = "A. Beacom and Ian Brittain",
note = "Due to the publisher's policy, the full text of this item will not be available from the repository until 10th November 2017.",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1080/09592296.2016.1169795",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "273--294",
journal = "Diplomacy & Statecraft",
issn = "0959-2296",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Public Diplomacy and the International Paralympic Committee: reconciling the roles of disability advocate and sports regulator

AU - Beacom, A.

AU - Brittain, Ian

N1 - Due to the publisher's policy, the full text of this item will not be available from the repository until 10th November 2017.

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - While the link between international diplomacy and the Olympic movement has been the subject of extensive academic and journalistic inquiry, the experience of diplomatic discourse as it relates to the relatively youthful Paralympic movement, has received little attention. This is not just in the context of state diplomacy, where for example the Paralympic Games may provide a conduit for the pursuit of specific policy objectives, but also in relation to the engagement of the International Paralympic Committee (IPC) as an evolving non-state actor, in the diplomatic process. The idea of the IPC as an advocacy body engaged through public diplomacy in promoting disability rights is explored as an element of the contemporary politics of disability. The paper considers the relationship between the activities of the IPC and wider lobbying by disabled people’s organizations (DPOs) as a means of leveraging change in domestic and international policy toward disability. In relation to the global development agenda, the paper assesses IPC responses to the gulf in resourcing for parasport (as well as more fundamental health and education services) between high and low resource regions. It suggests that the asymmetry between national teams, evident in levels of representation and podium success at Parasports events presents a challenge to the legitimacy of the IPC as an international advocate for disability rights. It considers the response of the organization from the perspective of public diplomacy and locates that response within the wider diplomacy of development.This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Diplomacy & Statecraft on 10 May 2016, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/09592296.2016.1169795

AB - While the link between international diplomacy and the Olympic movement has been the subject of extensive academic and journalistic inquiry, the experience of diplomatic discourse as it relates to the relatively youthful Paralympic movement, has received little attention. This is not just in the context of state diplomacy, where for example the Paralympic Games may provide a conduit for the pursuit of specific policy objectives, but also in relation to the engagement of the International Paralympic Committee (IPC) as an evolving non-state actor, in the diplomatic process. The idea of the IPC as an advocacy body engaged through public diplomacy in promoting disability rights is explored as an element of the contemporary politics of disability. The paper considers the relationship between the activities of the IPC and wider lobbying by disabled people’s organizations (DPOs) as a means of leveraging change in domestic and international policy toward disability. In relation to the global development agenda, the paper assesses IPC responses to the gulf in resourcing for parasport (as well as more fundamental health and education services) between high and low resource regions. It suggests that the asymmetry between national teams, evident in levels of representation and podium success at Parasports events presents a challenge to the legitimacy of the IPC as an international advocate for disability rights. It considers the response of the organization from the perspective of public diplomacy and locates that response within the wider diplomacy of development.This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Diplomacy & Statecraft on 10 May 2016, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/09592296.2016.1169795

KW - international diplomacy

KW - Olympic movement

KW - Paralympics

U2 - 10.1080/09592296.2016.1169795

DO - 10.1080/09592296.2016.1169795

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - 273

EP - 294

JO - Diplomacy & Statecraft

JF - Diplomacy & Statecraft

SN - 0959-2296

IS - 2

ER -