Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Protection of [Dis] Information Bill

  • Tasneem Joosub
  • , W. Maroun
    • University of the Witwatersrand

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Regulatory developments are frequently affected by unintended consequences that may detract from the original intention of the respective law-makers. For example, the enactment of The Sarbanes Oxley Act (2002), while purportedly aimed at improving audit and statutory reporting quality, has been marred by a series of unexpected shortcomings that have undermined the original intention of the legislators. This research uses a discursive critical style to explore possible tensions between current audit practice and the Protection of Information Bill (2011) as a South Africa-specific example of unforeseen implications of proposed legislation. At the same time, the research points to the relevance of political power when examining policy developments in a modern or post-modern society.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)15-30
    Number of pages16
    JournalSouthern African Journal of Accountability and Auditing Research
    Volume14
    Issue number1
    Publication statusPublished - 2013

    Keywords

    • Audit
    • Information Bill
    • Legislators
    • Political
    • Regulatory and Sarbanes Oxley Act

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Protection of [Dis] Information Bill'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this