Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Prospective assessment of the diagnostic accuracy of multi-site photoplethysmography pulse measurements for diagnosis of peripheral artery disease in primary care

  • Gerard Stansby
  • , Andrew J. Sims
  • , Lesley Wilson
  • , Thomas A. W. Beale
  • , James Wightman
  • , Ina Guri
  • , Scott Wilkes
  • , Shona Haining
  • , John Allen
  • , NOTEPAD Study Team
    • Freeman Hospital
    • University of Sunderland
    • North of England Commissioning Support Unit
    • Newcastle University
    • Agilent Technologies LDA UK
    • King's College London

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    313 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is associated with cerebral and coronary artery disease. Symptomatic PAD affects about 5% of people over 55 years; many more have asymptomatic PAD. Early detection enables modification of arterial disease risk factors. Diagnostically, assessment of symptoms or signs can be unreliable; ankle brachial pressure index (ABPI) testing is time-consuming and few healthcare professionals are properly trained. This study assessed the diagnostic accuracy of multi-site photoplethysmography (MPPG), an alternative non-invasive test for PAD, in primary care. PAD patients identified from general practice registers were age- and sex-matched with controls. Participants were assessed using MPPG, ABPI and duplex ultrasound (DUS). Outcome measures were sensitivity and specificity of MPPG and ABPI (relative to DUS) and concordance. MPPG test results were available in 249 of 298 eligible participants from 16 practices between May 2015 and November 2016. DUS detected PAD in 101/249 (40.6%). MPPG sensitivity was 79.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 69.9–87.6%), with specificity 71.9% (95% CI 63.7–79.2%). ABPI sensitivity was 80.2% (95% CI 70.8–87.6%), with specificity 88.6% (95% CI 82–93.5%). With comparable sensitivity to ABPI, MPPG is quick, automated and simpler to do than ABPI; it offers the potential for rapid and accessible PAD assessments in primary care.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)859-867
    Number of pages9
    JournalAngiology
    Volume74
    Issue number9
    Early online date18 Aug 2022
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Oct 2023

    Bibliographical note

    Copyright © and Moral Rights are retained by the author(s) and/ or other
    copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial
    research or study, without prior permission or charge. This item cannot be
    reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in
    writing from the copyright holder(s). The content must not be changed in any
    way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal
    permission of the copyright holders.

    This document is the author’s post-print version, incorporating any revisions
    agreed during the peer-review process. Some differences between the
    published version and this version may remain and you are advised to consult
    the published version if you wish to cite from it.

    Funder


    Funding Information: This report is independent research funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR), Invention for Innovation project grant ‘Innovative photoplethysmography technology for rapid non-invasive assessment of peripheral arterial disease in primary care’, II-C1-0412-20003.

    Funding

    FundersFunder number
    National Health Service
    National Institute for Health and Care Research
    Invention for InnovationII-C1-0412-20003
    Invention for Innovation

      Keywords

      • diagnosis
      • duplex ultrasound
      • peripheral arterial disease
      • photoplethysmography
      • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

      Fingerprint

      Dive into the research topics of 'Prospective assessment of the diagnostic accuracy of multi-site photoplethysmography pulse measurements for diagnosis of peripheral artery disease in primary care'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

      Cite this