Propensity Score Analysis

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

    Abstract

    In the evaluation of most interventions in criminal justice settings, evaluators have no control over assignment to treatment and control/comparison conditions, which means that the treated and comparison groups may have differences that lead to biased conclusions regarding treatment effectiveness. Propensity score analysis can be used to balance the differences in the groups, which can be used in a number of ways to reduce biased conclusions regarding effectiveness. A review of propensity scoring studies was conducted for this chapter, where the limited number of evaluations of criminal justice interventions using these methods was identified. Due to the small number of these studies, research was also reviewed if propensity scoring had been employed to evaluate interventions that are similar to those in criminal justice systems. These studies are used as examples to demonstrate how the methods can be used to evaluate criminal justice interventions, the different ways propensity scores can be used to analyse treatment and comparison group differences, and the strengths and limitations of this approach. It is concluded that, while not appropriate for all interventions/settings, propensity score analysis can be useful in criminal justice arenas, at least to investigate the comparability of treatment and comparison groups, with suspected non-comparability being a common weakness of traditional quasi-experimental studies and frequently cited limitation in terms of drawing efficacy conclusions from such evaluations.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationPerspectives on Evaluating Criminal Justice and Corrections
    EditorsErica Bowen, Sarah Brown
    PublisherEmerald
    Pages173-198
    Number of pages16
    ISBN (Electronic)978-1-78052-645-4
    ISBN (Print)978-1-78052-644-7
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2012

    Publication series

    NameAdvances in Evaluation Science

    Fingerprint

    justice
    Group
    evaluation
    treatment effectiveness

    Cite this

    Brown, S. (2012). Propensity Score Analysis. In E. Bowen, & S. Brown (Eds.), Perspectives on Evaluating Criminal Justice and Corrections (pp. 173-198). (Advances in Evaluation Science). Emerald. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1474-7863%282012%290000013012

    Propensity Score Analysis. / Brown, Sarah.

    Perspectives on Evaluating Criminal Justice and Corrections. ed. / Erica Bowen; Sarah Brown. Emerald, 2012. p. 173-198 (Advances in Evaluation Science).

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

    Brown, S 2012, Propensity Score Analysis. in E Bowen & S Brown (eds), Perspectives on Evaluating Criminal Justice and Corrections. Advances in Evaluation Science, Emerald, pp. 173-198. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1474-7863%282012%290000013012
    Brown S. Propensity Score Analysis. In Bowen E, Brown S, editors, Perspectives on Evaluating Criminal Justice and Corrections. Emerald. 2012. p. 173-198. (Advances in Evaluation Science). https://doi.org/10.1108/S1474-7863%282012%290000013012
    Brown, Sarah. / Propensity Score Analysis. Perspectives on Evaluating Criminal Justice and Corrections. editor / Erica Bowen ; Sarah Brown. Emerald, 2012. pp. 173-198 (Advances in Evaluation Science).
    @inbook{aa26c6b1e8f942bc908a8ff65d8ae82f,
    title = "Propensity Score Analysis",
    abstract = "In the evaluation of most interventions in criminal justice settings, evaluators have no control over assignment to treatment and control/comparison conditions, which means that the treated and comparison groups may have differences that lead to biased conclusions regarding treatment effectiveness. Propensity score analysis can be used to balance the differences in the groups, which can be used in a number of ways to reduce biased conclusions regarding effectiveness. A review of propensity scoring studies was conducted for this chapter, where the limited number of evaluations of criminal justice interventions using these methods was identified. Due to the small number of these studies, research was also reviewed if propensity scoring had been employed to evaluate interventions that are similar to those in criminal justice systems. These studies are used as examples to demonstrate how the methods can be used to evaluate criminal justice interventions, the different ways propensity scores can be used to analyse treatment and comparison group differences, and the strengths and limitations of this approach. It is concluded that, while not appropriate for all interventions/settings, propensity score analysis can be useful in criminal justice arenas, at least to investigate the comparability of treatment and comparison groups, with suspected non-comparability being a common weakness of traditional quasi-experimental studies and frequently cited limitation in terms of drawing efficacy conclusions from such evaluations.",
    author = "Sarah Brown",
    year = "2012",
    doi = "10.1108/S1474-7863{\%}282012{\%}290000013012",
    language = "English",
    isbn = "978-1-78052-644-7",
    series = "Advances in Evaluation Science",
    publisher = "Emerald",
    pages = "173--198",
    editor = "Erica Bowen and Sarah Brown",
    booktitle = "Perspectives on Evaluating Criminal Justice and Corrections",

    }

    TY - CHAP

    T1 - Propensity Score Analysis

    AU - Brown, Sarah

    PY - 2012

    Y1 - 2012

    N2 - In the evaluation of most interventions in criminal justice settings, evaluators have no control over assignment to treatment and control/comparison conditions, which means that the treated and comparison groups may have differences that lead to biased conclusions regarding treatment effectiveness. Propensity score analysis can be used to balance the differences in the groups, which can be used in a number of ways to reduce biased conclusions regarding effectiveness. A review of propensity scoring studies was conducted for this chapter, where the limited number of evaluations of criminal justice interventions using these methods was identified. Due to the small number of these studies, research was also reviewed if propensity scoring had been employed to evaluate interventions that are similar to those in criminal justice systems. These studies are used as examples to demonstrate how the methods can be used to evaluate criminal justice interventions, the different ways propensity scores can be used to analyse treatment and comparison group differences, and the strengths and limitations of this approach. It is concluded that, while not appropriate for all interventions/settings, propensity score analysis can be useful in criminal justice arenas, at least to investigate the comparability of treatment and comparison groups, with suspected non-comparability being a common weakness of traditional quasi-experimental studies and frequently cited limitation in terms of drawing efficacy conclusions from such evaluations.

    AB - In the evaluation of most interventions in criminal justice settings, evaluators have no control over assignment to treatment and control/comparison conditions, which means that the treated and comparison groups may have differences that lead to biased conclusions regarding treatment effectiveness. Propensity score analysis can be used to balance the differences in the groups, which can be used in a number of ways to reduce biased conclusions regarding effectiveness. A review of propensity scoring studies was conducted for this chapter, where the limited number of evaluations of criminal justice interventions using these methods was identified. Due to the small number of these studies, research was also reviewed if propensity scoring had been employed to evaluate interventions that are similar to those in criminal justice systems. These studies are used as examples to demonstrate how the methods can be used to evaluate criminal justice interventions, the different ways propensity scores can be used to analyse treatment and comparison group differences, and the strengths and limitations of this approach. It is concluded that, while not appropriate for all interventions/settings, propensity score analysis can be useful in criminal justice arenas, at least to investigate the comparability of treatment and comparison groups, with suspected non-comparability being a common weakness of traditional quasi-experimental studies and frequently cited limitation in terms of drawing efficacy conclusions from such evaluations.

    U2 - 10.1108/S1474-7863%282012%290000013012

    DO - 10.1108/S1474-7863%282012%290000013012

    M3 - Chapter

    SN - 978-1-78052-644-7

    T3 - Advances in Evaluation Science

    SP - 173

    EP - 198

    BT - Perspectives on Evaluating Criminal Justice and Corrections

    A2 - Bowen, Erica

    A2 - Brown, Sarah

    PB - Emerald

    ER -