Abstract
In this chapter, we will argue that the development of bottom up
transnational social responsibilities within the business sector constitutes a robust and
workable alternative to the concept of legal accountability.
First, we will provide and overview of the debates and policy initiatives on private
military and security corporations in order to establish the discursive legal/political
context.
Secondly, we will discuss the concept of transnational law as it developed since Phillip
Jessup popularized the idea 60 years ago.13 I will juxtapose the concept of a
transnational legal space with the Benthamian conception of law14 being either national
or international and argue that PMSCs are operating in a transnational business and
security environment
Thirdly, we will set out and examine the diversity of roles of the private military and
security companies in order to map roles and activities against possible responsibility
and accountability schemes.
Fourthly, the concepts of international and transnational responsibility and
accountability are reviewed in order to identify the linkages between international and
transnational regulation, and determine areas of overlap and the need for clarification.
Finally, we will formulate some conclusions and suggestions for understanding
initiatives within the sector from a transnational legal perspective.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | 100 Years of Peace Through Law: Past and Future |
Editors | Andreas Von Arnauld, Nele Matz-Lück, Kerstin Odendahl |
Place of Publication | Berlin |
Publisher | Dunker & Humblot |
ISBN (Print) | 978-3-428-54834-7 |
Publication status | Published - 2015 |
Bibliographical note
There is no full text available on the repository at this timeKeywords
- Völkerrecht
- International Law
- Humanitäres Völkerrecht
- Public International Law
- Friedenssicherung
- Peace Keeping