Practitioners' perspectives on the UK cost of capital

Edward McLaney, John Pointon, Melanie Thomas, Jon Tucker

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

26 Citations (Scopus)
36 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The aims of this study were to determine how UK finance practitioners derive and review the cost of capital, and to ascertain whether the final figure varied with the choice of method. To investigate behaviour in the real world a survey questionnaire was employed, eliciting responses from the finance directors of 193 UK quoted firms. The results suggest that the cost of capital calculation is subject to wide variation across firms, both with regard to the overall figure and the precise computation of its components. The intuitive appeal of the WACC and CAPM approaches appears to ensure their continued popularity in the real world. However, firms tend not to make all of the adjustments to the overall figure which academics might expect, only making simple adjustments for risk and the tax advantage to debt. The after-tax money cost of capital which is approximately 10%, is Influenced by the choice of method, and firms do not appear to revise their overall cost figure rapidly in response to the environment. The cost of capital decision is of such strategic importance for the longer-term maintenance and expansion of firm value that it is nearly always made within the domain of the board of directors.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)123-138
Number of pages16
JournalEuropean Journal of Finance
Volume10
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Cost of capital
Finance
Tax
Capital asset pricing model
Debt
Costs
Board of directors
Firm value
Questionnaire survey

Bibliographical note

This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in
European Journal of Finance on 01/04/2004, available
online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/1351847032000137401

Copyright © and Moral Rights are retained by the author(s) and/ or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This item cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder(s). The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.

Keywords

  • CAPM
  • Cost of capital
  • Dividends
  • Earnings
  • WACC

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Practitioners' perspectives on the UK cost of capital. / McLaney, Edward; Pointon, John; Thomas, Melanie; Tucker, Jon.

In: European Journal of Finance, Vol. 10, No. 2, 01.01.2004, p. 123-138.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

McLaney, Edward ; Pointon, John ; Thomas, Melanie ; Tucker, Jon. / Practitioners' perspectives on the UK cost of capital. In: European Journal of Finance. 2004 ; Vol. 10, No. 2. pp. 123-138.
@article{078757e6573742edbeb44d38ded4b51b,
title = "Practitioners' perspectives on the UK cost of capital",
abstract = "The aims of this study were to determine how UK finance practitioners derive and review the cost of capital, and to ascertain whether the final figure varied with the choice of method. To investigate behaviour in the real world a survey questionnaire was employed, eliciting responses from the finance directors of 193 UK quoted firms. The results suggest that the cost of capital calculation is subject to wide variation across firms, both with regard to the overall figure and the precise computation of its components. The intuitive appeal of the WACC and CAPM approaches appears to ensure their continued popularity in the real world. However, firms tend not to make all of the adjustments to the overall figure which academics might expect, only making simple adjustments for risk and the tax advantage to debt. The after-tax money cost of capital which is approximately 10{\%}, is Influenced by the choice of method, and firms do not appear to revise their overall cost figure rapidly in response to the environment. The cost of capital decision is of such strategic importance for the longer-term maintenance and expansion of firm value that it is nearly always made within the domain of the board of directors.",
keywords = "CAPM, Cost of capital, Dividends, Earnings, WACC",
author = "Edward McLaney and John Pointon and Melanie Thomas and Jon Tucker",
note = "This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in European Journal of Finance on 01/04/2004, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/1351847032000137401 Copyright {\circledC} and Moral Rights are retained by the author(s) and/ or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This item cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder(s). The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.",
year = "2004",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/1351847032000137401",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "123--138",
journal = "The European Journal of Finance",
issn = "1351-847X",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Practitioners' perspectives on the UK cost of capital

AU - McLaney, Edward

AU - Pointon, John

AU - Thomas, Melanie

AU - Tucker, Jon

N1 - This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in European Journal of Finance on 01/04/2004, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/1351847032000137401 Copyright © and Moral Rights are retained by the author(s) and/ or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This item cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder(s). The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.

PY - 2004/1/1

Y1 - 2004/1/1

N2 - The aims of this study were to determine how UK finance practitioners derive and review the cost of capital, and to ascertain whether the final figure varied with the choice of method. To investigate behaviour in the real world a survey questionnaire was employed, eliciting responses from the finance directors of 193 UK quoted firms. The results suggest that the cost of capital calculation is subject to wide variation across firms, both with regard to the overall figure and the precise computation of its components. The intuitive appeal of the WACC and CAPM approaches appears to ensure their continued popularity in the real world. However, firms tend not to make all of the adjustments to the overall figure which academics might expect, only making simple adjustments for risk and the tax advantage to debt. The after-tax money cost of capital which is approximately 10%, is Influenced by the choice of method, and firms do not appear to revise their overall cost figure rapidly in response to the environment. The cost of capital decision is of such strategic importance for the longer-term maintenance and expansion of firm value that it is nearly always made within the domain of the board of directors.

AB - The aims of this study were to determine how UK finance practitioners derive and review the cost of capital, and to ascertain whether the final figure varied with the choice of method. To investigate behaviour in the real world a survey questionnaire was employed, eliciting responses from the finance directors of 193 UK quoted firms. The results suggest that the cost of capital calculation is subject to wide variation across firms, both with regard to the overall figure and the precise computation of its components. The intuitive appeal of the WACC and CAPM approaches appears to ensure their continued popularity in the real world. However, firms tend not to make all of the adjustments to the overall figure which academics might expect, only making simple adjustments for risk and the tax advantage to debt. The after-tax money cost of capital which is approximately 10%, is Influenced by the choice of method, and firms do not appear to revise their overall cost figure rapidly in response to the environment. The cost of capital decision is of such strategic importance for the longer-term maintenance and expansion of firm value that it is nearly always made within the domain of the board of directors.

KW - CAPM

KW - Cost of capital

KW - Dividends

KW - Earnings

KW - WACC

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1842487296&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/1351847032000137401

DO - 10.1080/1351847032000137401

M3 - Review article

VL - 10

SP - 123

EP - 138

JO - The European Journal of Finance

JF - The European Journal of Finance

SN - 1351-847X

IS - 2

ER -