Abstract
Responding to repeated calls for marketing academicians to connect with marketing actors, we offer a discourse analysis of the ways in which managers portray their practices. Focusing on the micro-discourses and narratives that marketing actors draw upon to represent their work, we argue that dominant representations of marketing knowledge production present a number of critical concerns for marketing theory. We also evidence that the often promoted idea of a need to close the gap between theory, as a dominant discourse, and practice, as a way of doing marketing, is problematic to pursue. We suggest that a more fruitful agenda resides in the development of a range of polyphonic and creative micro-discourses of management, promoting context, difference and individual meaning in marketing knowledge production.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 97-118 |
| Number of pages | 22 |
| Journal | Marketing Theory |
| Volume | 14 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Early online date | 20 Nov 2013 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Mar 2014 |
Keywords
- conflict
- discourse
- legitimacy
- market management
- micro discourse
- tacit knowledge