Practitioner Accounts and Knowledge Production: An Analysis of Three Marketing Discourses

Barry Ardley, Lee Quinn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Responding to repeated calls for marketing academicians to connect with marketing actors, we offer a discourse analysis of the ways in which managers portray their practices. Focusing on the micro-discourses and narratives that marketing actors draw upon to represent their work, we argue that dominant representations of marketing knowledge production present a number of critical concerns for marketing theory. We also evidence that the often promoted idea of a need to close the gap between theory, as a dominant discourse, and practice, as a way of doing marketing, is problematic to pursue. We suggest that a more fruitful agenda resides in the development of a range of polyphonic and creative micro-discourses of management, promoting context, difference and individual meaning in marketing knowledge production.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)97-118
Number of pages22
JournalMarketing Theory
Volume14
Issue number1
Early online date20 Nov 2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2014

Fingerprint

Marketing
Knowledge production
Discourse
Marketing theory
Agenda
Discourse analysis
Managers

Keywords

  • conflict
  • discourse
  • legitimacy
  • market management
  • micro discourse
  • tacit knowledge

Cite this

Practitioner Accounts and Knowledge Production: An Analysis of Three Marketing Discourses. / Ardley, Barry; Quinn, Lee.

In: Marketing Theory, Vol. 14, No. 1, 01.03.2014, p. 97-118.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c71cda282a254fc293388de6214673a4,
title = "Practitioner Accounts and Knowledge Production: An Analysis of Three Marketing Discourses",
abstract = "Responding to repeated calls for marketing academicians to connect with marketing actors, we offer a discourse analysis of the ways in which managers portray their practices. Focusing on the micro-discourses and narratives that marketing actors draw upon to represent their work, we argue that dominant representations of marketing knowledge production present a number of critical concerns for marketing theory. We also evidence that the often promoted idea of a need to close the gap between theory, as a dominant discourse, and practice, as a way of doing marketing, is problematic to pursue. We suggest that a more fruitful agenda resides in the development of a range of polyphonic and creative micro-discourses of management, promoting context, difference and individual meaning in marketing knowledge production.",
keywords = "conflict, discourse, legitimacy, market management, micro discourse, tacit knowledge",
author = "Barry Ardley and Lee Quinn",
year = "2014",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1470593113512322",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "97--118",
journal = "Marketing Theory",
issn = "1470-5931",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Practitioner Accounts and Knowledge Production: An Analysis of Three Marketing Discourses

AU - Ardley, Barry

AU - Quinn, Lee

PY - 2014/3/1

Y1 - 2014/3/1

N2 - Responding to repeated calls for marketing academicians to connect with marketing actors, we offer a discourse analysis of the ways in which managers portray their practices. Focusing on the micro-discourses and narratives that marketing actors draw upon to represent their work, we argue that dominant representations of marketing knowledge production present a number of critical concerns for marketing theory. We also evidence that the often promoted idea of a need to close the gap between theory, as a dominant discourse, and practice, as a way of doing marketing, is problematic to pursue. We suggest that a more fruitful agenda resides in the development of a range of polyphonic and creative micro-discourses of management, promoting context, difference and individual meaning in marketing knowledge production.

AB - Responding to repeated calls for marketing academicians to connect with marketing actors, we offer a discourse analysis of the ways in which managers portray their practices. Focusing on the micro-discourses and narratives that marketing actors draw upon to represent their work, we argue that dominant representations of marketing knowledge production present a number of critical concerns for marketing theory. We also evidence that the often promoted idea of a need to close the gap between theory, as a dominant discourse, and practice, as a way of doing marketing, is problematic to pursue. We suggest that a more fruitful agenda resides in the development of a range of polyphonic and creative micro-discourses of management, promoting context, difference and individual meaning in marketing knowledge production.

KW - conflict

KW - discourse

KW - legitimacy

KW - market management

KW - micro discourse

KW - tacit knowledge

U2 - 10.1177/1470593113512322

DO - 10.1177/1470593113512322

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 97

EP - 118

JO - Marketing Theory

JF - Marketing Theory

SN - 1470-5931

IS - 1

ER -