Abstract
Responding to repeated calls for marketing academicians to connect with marketing actors, we offer a discourse analysis of the ways in which managers portray their practices. Focusing on the micro-discourses and narratives that marketing actors draw upon to represent their work, we argue that dominant representations of marketing knowledge production present a number of critical concerns for marketing theory. We also evidence that the often promoted idea of a need to close the gap between theory, as a dominant discourse, and practice, as a way of doing marketing, is problematic to pursue. We suggest that a more fruitful agenda resides in the development of a range of polyphonic and creative micro-discourses of management, promoting context, difference and individual meaning in marketing knowledge production.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 97-118 |
Number of pages | 22 |
Journal | Marketing Theory |
Volume | 14 |
Issue number | 1 |
Early online date | 20 Nov 2013 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Mar 2014 |
Keywords
- conflict
- discourse
- legitimacy
- market management
- micro discourse
- tacit knowledge
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Practitioner Accounts and Knowledge Production: An Analysis of Three Marketing Discourses'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Profiles
-
Lee Quinn
- Research Centre for Business in Society - Professor of Consumer Insight and Behaviour Change
Person: Teaching and Research