Power and impulse applied during push press exercise

Jason P Lake, Peter D Mundy, Paul Comfort

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The aim of this study was to quantify the load, which maximized peak and mean power, and impulse applied to these loads, during the push press and to compare them to equivalent jump squat data. Resistance-trained men performed 2 push press (n = 17; age: 25.4 ± 7.4 years; height: 183.4 ± 5 cm; body mass: 87 ± 15.6 kg) and jump squat (n = 8 of original 17; age: 28.7 ± 8.1 years; height: 184.3 ± 5.5 cm; mass: 98 ± 5.3 kg) singles with 10-90% of their push press and back squat 1 repetition maximum (1RM), respectively, in 10% 1RM increments while standing on a force platform. Push press peak and mean power was maximized with 75.3 ± 16.4 and 64.7 ± 20% 1RM, respectively, and impulses applied to these loads were 243 ± 29 N·s and 231 ± 36 N·s. Increasing and decreasing load, from the load that maximized peak and mean power, by 10 and 20% 1RM reduced peak and mean power by 6-15% (p ≤ 0.05). Push press and jump squat maximum peak power (7%, p = 0.08) and the impulse that was applied to the load that maximized peak (8%, p = 0.17) and mean (13%, p = 0.91) power were not significantly different, but push press maximum mean power was significantly greater than the jump squat equivalent (∼9.5%, p = 0.03). The mechanical demand of the push press is comparable with the jump squat and could provide a time-efficient combination of lower-body power and upper-body and trunk strength training.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2552-9
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Volume28
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Resistance Training
Exercise

Keywords

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Back
  • Biomechanical Phenomena
  • Exercise
  • Exercise Test
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Muscle Strength
  • Torso
  • Weight Lifting
  • Young Adult
  • Journal Article

Cite this

Power and impulse applied during push press exercise. / Lake, Jason P; Mundy, Peter D; Comfort, Paul.

In: Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, Vol. 28, No. 9, 09.2014, p. 2552-9.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b4190a168b9d4739913b351644ee49ee,
title = "Power and impulse applied during push press exercise",
abstract = "The aim of this study was to quantify the load, which maximized peak and mean power, and impulse applied to these loads, during the push press and to compare them to equivalent jump squat data. Resistance-trained men performed 2 push press (n = 17; age: 25.4 ± 7.4 years; height: 183.4 ± 5 cm; body mass: 87 ± 15.6 kg) and jump squat (n = 8 of original 17; age: 28.7 ± 8.1 years; height: 184.3 ± 5.5 cm; mass: 98 ± 5.3 kg) singles with 10-90{\%} of their push press and back squat 1 repetition maximum (1RM), respectively, in 10{\%} 1RM increments while standing on a force platform. Push press peak and mean power was maximized with 75.3 ± 16.4 and 64.7 ± 20{\%} 1RM, respectively, and impulses applied to these loads were 243 ± 29 N·s and 231 ± 36 N·s. Increasing and decreasing load, from the load that maximized peak and mean power, by 10 and 20{\%} 1RM reduced peak and mean power by 6-15{\%} (p ≤ 0.05). Push press and jump squat maximum peak power (7{\%}, p = 0.08) and the impulse that was applied to the load that maximized peak (8{\%}, p = 0.17) and mean (13{\%}, p = 0.91) power were not significantly different, but push press maximum mean power was significantly greater than the jump squat equivalent (∼9.5{\%}, p = 0.03). The mechanical demand of the push press is comparable with the jump squat and could provide a time-efficient combination of lower-body power and upper-body and trunk strength training.",
keywords = "Adolescent, Adult, Back, Biomechanical Phenomena, Exercise, Exercise Test, Humans, Male, Muscle Strength, Torso, Weight Lifting, Young Adult, Journal Article",
author = "Lake, {Jason P} and Mundy, {Peter D} and Paul Comfort",
year = "2014",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1519/JSC.0000000000000438",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "2552--9",
journal = "Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research",
issn = "1064-8011",
publisher = "Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Power and impulse applied during push press exercise

AU - Lake, Jason P

AU - Mundy, Peter D

AU - Comfort, Paul

PY - 2014/9

Y1 - 2014/9

N2 - The aim of this study was to quantify the load, which maximized peak and mean power, and impulse applied to these loads, during the push press and to compare them to equivalent jump squat data. Resistance-trained men performed 2 push press (n = 17; age: 25.4 ± 7.4 years; height: 183.4 ± 5 cm; body mass: 87 ± 15.6 kg) and jump squat (n = 8 of original 17; age: 28.7 ± 8.1 years; height: 184.3 ± 5.5 cm; mass: 98 ± 5.3 kg) singles with 10-90% of their push press and back squat 1 repetition maximum (1RM), respectively, in 10% 1RM increments while standing on a force platform. Push press peak and mean power was maximized with 75.3 ± 16.4 and 64.7 ± 20% 1RM, respectively, and impulses applied to these loads were 243 ± 29 N·s and 231 ± 36 N·s. Increasing and decreasing load, from the load that maximized peak and mean power, by 10 and 20% 1RM reduced peak and mean power by 6-15% (p ≤ 0.05). Push press and jump squat maximum peak power (7%, p = 0.08) and the impulse that was applied to the load that maximized peak (8%, p = 0.17) and mean (13%, p = 0.91) power were not significantly different, but push press maximum mean power was significantly greater than the jump squat equivalent (∼9.5%, p = 0.03). The mechanical demand of the push press is comparable with the jump squat and could provide a time-efficient combination of lower-body power and upper-body and trunk strength training.

AB - The aim of this study was to quantify the load, which maximized peak and mean power, and impulse applied to these loads, during the push press and to compare them to equivalent jump squat data. Resistance-trained men performed 2 push press (n = 17; age: 25.4 ± 7.4 years; height: 183.4 ± 5 cm; body mass: 87 ± 15.6 kg) and jump squat (n = 8 of original 17; age: 28.7 ± 8.1 years; height: 184.3 ± 5.5 cm; mass: 98 ± 5.3 kg) singles with 10-90% of their push press and back squat 1 repetition maximum (1RM), respectively, in 10% 1RM increments while standing on a force platform. Push press peak and mean power was maximized with 75.3 ± 16.4 and 64.7 ± 20% 1RM, respectively, and impulses applied to these loads were 243 ± 29 N·s and 231 ± 36 N·s. Increasing and decreasing load, from the load that maximized peak and mean power, by 10 and 20% 1RM reduced peak and mean power by 6-15% (p ≤ 0.05). Push press and jump squat maximum peak power (7%, p = 0.08) and the impulse that was applied to the load that maximized peak (8%, p = 0.17) and mean (13%, p = 0.91) power were not significantly different, but push press maximum mean power was significantly greater than the jump squat equivalent (∼9.5%, p = 0.03). The mechanical demand of the push press is comparable with the jump squat and could provide a time-efficient combination of lower-body power and upper-body and trunk strength training.

KW - Adolescent

KW - Adult

KW - Back

KW - Biomechanical Phenomena

KW - Exercise

KW - Exercise Test

KW - Humans

KW - Male

KW - Muscle Strength

KW - Torso

KW - Weight Lifting

KW - Young Adult

KW - Journal Article

U2 - 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000438

DO - 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000438

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 2552

EP - 2559

JO - Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research

JF - Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research

SN - 1064-8011

IS - 9

ER -