Abstract
Aims: To map the evidence on post-incident strategies for workplace violence in global hospital settings, define current literature gaps and provide direction for future research.
Design: Scoping review guided by Joanna Briggs Institute methodology.
Methods: A narrative synthesis, framed by the Haddon Matrix, categorised post-violence strat-egies by focus on staff (victims), aggressors (vectors), or the physical/social environment.
Data sources: Six databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Health Management Information Consortium) and Google Scholar were searched in January 2024.
Results: Twenty-seven articles were included. Post-violence strategies addressed: (1) staff support through debriefs and psychological, clinical and procedural assistance; (2) behaviour management, individualised plans, alerts and accountability measures for aggressors; and (3) system-level responses via incident investigations, feedback processes and integrated monitor-ing. These strategies were typically embedded within larger multicomponent workplace vio-lence programmes, with limited disaggregation of their specific effects.
Conclusion: The evidence base for tertiary prevention of workplace violence remains sparse. Most articles in this review equated success with violence reduction, reflecting a traditional (Safety-I) focus on risk mitigation, with limited attention to broader outcomes such as staff per-ceptions of safety or job-related affect. This underscores the need for a clearer focus on the mechanisms by which such interventions are expected to create change, providing an oppor-tunity to refine theory and practice.
Implications for the profession and/or patient care: The post-violence period offers a key juncture for mitigating incidents’ ripple effects. As frontline staff are often the primary ‘recipi-ents’ of interventions, future research and service improvement initiatives should focus more closely on outcomes relevant to staff experiences.
Impact: Incorporating a Safety-II perspective, which emphasises resilience and adaptive per-formance, could enable hospitals to strengthen ongoing operational capabilities in the aftermath of violence and help to redress the conditions that facilitate its recurrence.
Reporting Method: PRISMA-ScR.
Patient or Public Contribution: None.
Design: Scoping review guided by Joanna Briggs Institute methodology.
Methods: A narrative synthesis, framed by the Haddon Matrix, categorised post-violence strat-egies by focus on staff (victims), aggressors (vectors), or the physical/social environment.
Data sources: Six databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Health Management Information Consortium) and Google Scholar were searched in January 2024.
Results: Twenty-seven articles were included. Post-violence strategies addressed: (1) staff support through debriefs and psychological, clinical and procedural assistance; (2) behaviour management, individualised plans, alerts and accountability measures for aggressors; and (3) system-level responses via incident investigations, feedback processes and integrated monitor-ing. These strategies were typically embedded within larger multicomponent workplace vio-lence programmes, with limited disaggregation of their specific effects.
Conclusion: The evidence base for tertiary prevention of workplace violence remains sparse. Most articles in this review equated success with violence reduction, reflecting a traditional (Safety-I) focus on risk mitigation, with limited attention to broader outcomes such as staff per-ceptions of safety or job-related affect. This underscores the need for a clearer focus on the mechanisms by which such interventions are expected to create change, providing an oppor-tunity to refine theory and practice.
Implications for the profession and/or patient care: The post-violence period offers a key juncture for mitigating incidents’ ripple effects. As frontline staff are often the primary ‘recipi-ents’ of interventions, future research and service improvement initiatives should focus more closely on outcomes relevant to staff experiences.
Impact: Incorporating a Safety-II perspective, which emphasises resilience and adaptive per-formance, could enable hospitals to strengthen ongoing operational capabilities in the aftermath of violence and help to redress the conditions that facilitate its recurrence.
Reporting Method: PRISMA-ScR.
Patient or Public Contribution: None.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | (In-Press) |
| Number of pages | 18 |
| Journal | Journal of Advanced Nursing |
| Volume | (In-Press) |
| Early online date | 24 Dec 2025 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 24 Dec 2025 |
Bibliographical note
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium,provided the original work is properly citedUN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Violence
- post incident strategies
- Scoping review
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Post-Event Strategies for Workplace Violence Affecting Hospital Staff: A Scoping Review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS