Post acquisition profitability of banks: a comparison of domestic and cross border acquisitions in the European Union

M.A. Nnadi, Sailesh Tanna

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    4 Citations (Scopus)
    143 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    This study evaluates shareholder wealth and profitability of 62 large EU banks mergers and acquisitions that were involved in domestic or cross-border transactions during the period 1997-2007. We use the standardised cumulative abnormal returns (SCAR) technique and a long window of 61 days to capture merger announcement wealth effects of both domestic and cross-border acquiring banks. We argue that standardising abnormal returns helps eliminate any biases in the estimation of wealth effects by giving equal weighting to all events surrounding the merger. Our results establish that while the wealth effects of both types of mergers are negative, cross-border mergers create significant loss in shareholder value for the acquiring banks. Using standard determinants of profitability, we also conduct hierarchical regressions to ascertain the degree of merger impact on post-acquisition profitability. The results show that acquiring banks’ capital strength and cost efficiency are most important factors influencing profitability in cross-border mergers. In contrast, profitability in the case of domestic mergers is driven more by the acquiring banks’ ability to take on greater risk.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)310 - 331
    JournalGlobal Business and Economics Review
    Volume16
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2014

    Keywords

    • merger
    • acquisition
    • shareholder wealth
    • profitability
    • standardised abnormal returns
    • cross border
    • domestic
    • European Union
    • EU

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Post acquisition profitability of banks: a comparison of domestic and cross border acquisitions in the European Union'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this