Abstract
Evidence suggests that head position increases risk of whiplash injury to vehicle occupants in rear impacts. The
aims of this study were to collect exposure data on head position and rotation during naturalistic driving and to
express this in the form of a parametric statistical model for use in computer simulations to optimize seat design for
neck injury prevention. An instrumented vehicle equipped with an eye-tracker was used to collect digital readings
that were complemented with a four-track video recording. Data from driving trials (approximately 30-60 minutes)
were analyzed when the vehicle was stopped, stopping or moving slowly as these are thought to be manoeuvres
where impact and hence neck injury risk is highest. It was found that the ‘t location-scale’ distribution provided best
fit to the experimental data and that the measured interquartile range or central 50% of head movement in such
manoeuvres was approximately ± 15 mm lateral, ± 10 mm longitudinal and ± 7.5 degrees left-right rotation. These
ranges provide guidance on the degree of biofidelity required in computer simulation models. Further analysis
showed that out-of-range head rotation and rapid rotation explained the majority of missing digital readings and
these two motions should therefore be modeled separately as elements of the parametric model.
aims of this study were to collect exposure data on head position and rotation during naturalistic driving and to
express this in the form of a parametric statistical model for use in computer simulations to optimize seat design for
neck injury prevention. An instrumented vehicle equipped with an eye-tracker was used to collect digital readings
that were complemented with a four-track video recording. Data from driving trials (approximately 30-60 minutes)
were analyzed when the vehicle was stopped, stopping or moving slowly as these are thought to be manoeuvres
where impact and hence neck injury risk is highest. It was found that the ‘t location-scale’ distribution provided best
fit to the experimental data and that the measured interquartile range or central 50% of head movement in such
manoeuvres was approximately ± 15 mm lateral, ± 10 mm longitudinal and ± 7.5 degrees left-right rotation. These
ranges provide guidance on the degree of biofidelity required in computer simulation models. Further analysis
showed that out-of-range head rotation and rapid rotation explained the majority of missing digital readings and
these two motions should therefore be modeled separately as elements of the parametric model.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 012 |
Number of pages | 6 |
Journal | Journal of Ergonomics |
Volume | S3 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2015 |
Keywords
- Head position and rotation
- Risk factor
- Whiplash
- Softtissue neck injury
- Rear impact
- Naturalistic driving
- Seat design