There is today a growing sense of a global rise of populism. Right-wing populist leaders and parties claim to represent the people and pit them against a "corrupt"elite and "dangerous"Others. However, the international dimensions of populism remain largely unexplored in the populism and international relations (IR) literature. By analyzing the relationship between foreign policy and populism, this article seeks to show how the phenomenon of populism can be integrated into IR theory and how IR scholarship can inform debates on populism. The article argues that poststructuralist IR, with its focus on foreign policy as a boundary-drawing practice that demarcates the Self from the Other, allows us to study how populist actors can use foreign policy as a site for the reproduction of their claim to represent the people. To grasp this, the article identifies different discursive strategies through which the people/elite antagonism can be constructed and interacts with other antagonisms such as the inside/ outside divide of nationalism. It illustrates its arguments with a case study on India's foreign policy discourse under the Hindu nationalist Narendra Modi, who has promised to purify India from a corrupt elite and pursue an "India first"policy.
Bibliographical notePublisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) (2019).
- Foreign policy
- International relations theory
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Geography, Planning and Development
- Political Science and International Relations