Political markets? Politics and economics in the emergence of markets for biodiversity offsets

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This paper analyses the relationship between politics and performativity of economics in the emergence of markets for biodiversity offsets. While the role of economics in constructing markets has been demonstrated by sociology and social studies of science, it has also become apparent that politics plays an important role in the material outcome of economic experiments. Two case studies of the creation of markets for biodiversity offsets are analysed, in the United States and England. The findings suggest that the creation of both markets is rooted in the language, concepts and models of economics. Politics, on the other hand, functions as a mediator of the material expression of those models. Through this mediation effect, similar economic models are performed differently, resulting in a variety of markets. This suggests that the material outcomes of processes of market creation are not defined at the outset, but can be influenced by political processes.
LanguageEnglish
Pages(in press)
JournalReview of Social Economy
Volume(in press)
StateAccepted/In press - 17 Jan 2018

Fingerprint

Biodiversity
Economics
Sociology
Language
Mediator
Performativity
Mediation effect
Economic experiments
England
Political process

Bibliographical note

This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Review of Social Economy on [date of publication], available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/[Article DOI].”

Keywords

  • Markets
  • Biodiversity offsets
  • Calculation
  • Performativity of economics
  • Politics

Cite this

Political markets? Politics and economics in the emergence of markets for biodiversity offsets. / Ferreira, Carlos; Ferreira, Jennifer.

In: Review of Social Economy, Vol. (in press), 17.01.2018, p. (in press).

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{92b2ffead1d341f79b5cf9ed159f6292,
title = "Political markets? Politics and economics in the emergence of markets for biodiversity offsets",
abstract = "This paper analyses the relationship between politics and performativity of economics in the emergence of markets for biodiversity offsets. While the role of economics in constructing markets has been demonstrated by sociology and social studies of science, it has also become apparent that politics plays an important role in the material outcome of economic experiments. Two case studies of the creation of markets for biodiversity offsets are analysed, in the United States and England. The findings suggest that the creation of both markets is rooted in the language, concepts and models of economics. Politics, on the other hand, functions as a mediator of the material expression of those models. Through this mediation effect, similar economic models are performed differently, resulting in a variety of markets. This suggests that the material outcomes of processes of market creation are not defined at the outset, but can be influenced by political processes.",
keywords = "Markets, Biodiversity offsets, Calculation, Performativity of economics, Politics",
author = "Carlos Ferreira and Jennifer Ferreira",
note = "This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Review of Social Economy on [date of publication], available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/[Article DOI].”",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "17",
language = "English",
volume = "(in press)",
pages = "(in press)",
journal = "Review of Social Economy",
issn = "0034-6764",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Political markets? Politics and economics in the emergence of markets for biodiversity offsets

AU - Ferreira,Carlos

AU - Ferreira,Jennifer

N1 - This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Review of Social Economy on [date of publication], available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/[Article DOI].”

PY - 2018/1/17

Y1 - 2018/1/17

N2 - This paper analyses the relationship between politics and performativity of economics in the emergence of markets for biodiversity offsets. While the role of economics in constructing markets has been demonstrated by sociology and social studies of science, it has also become apparent that politics plays an important role in the material outcome of economic experiments. Two case studies of the creation of markets for biodiversity offsets are analysed, in the United States and England. The findings suggest that the creation of both markets is rooted in the language, concepts and models of economics. Politics, on the other hand, functions as a mediator of the material expression of those models. Through this mediation effect, similar economic models are performed differently, resulting in a variety of markets. This suggests that the material outcomes of processes of market creation are not defined at the outset, but can be influenced by political processes.

AB - This paper analyses the relationship between politics and performativity of economics in the emergence of markets for biodiversity offsets. While the role of economics in constructing markets has been demonstrated by sociology and social studies of science, it has also become apparent that politics plays an important role in the material outcome of economic experiments. Two case studies of the creation of markets for biodiversity offsets are analysed, in the United States and England. The findings suggest that the creation of both markets is rooted in the language, concepts and models of economics. Politics, on the other hand, functions as a mediator of the material expression of those models. Through this mediation effect, similar economic models are performed differently, resulting in a variety of markets. This suggests that the material outcomes of processes of market creation are not defined at the outset, but can be influenced by political processes.

KW - Markets

KW - Biodiversity offsets

KW - Calculation

KW - Performativity of economics

KW - Politics

M3 - Article

VL - (in press)

SP - (in press)

JO - Review of Social Economy

T2 - Review of Social Economy

JF - Review of Social Economy

SN - 0034-6764

ER -