Projects per year
Abstract
The study analysed 25 design submissions to the ACES Challenge from educators (aged 18+) in Indonesia (n=10), Malaysia (n=9), and Vietnam (n=6). Only educators contributed as research participants via activity designs and reflections; any learner involvement occurred independently within schools and was beyond the study’s scope. The analysis focused on educators’ design rationales and value-led reflections, alongside experts’ assessments of playfulness, frugality, and perceived learning potential, referring to the anticipated educational value of each activity, ensuring alignment with the approved ethical framework.
Using a mixed-methods approach, the study analysed how playful and frugal values were embedded in these submissions. Quantitative analysis examined correlations between the two value dimensions across educator-designed activities using a framework-informed rubric. In parallel, qualitative thematic analysis of reflective narratives and submitted materials explored how values were interpreted and applied in practice. This triangulation enabled a deeper understanding of value-led design processes across culturally and materially diverse contexts.
Findings suggest that playful and frugal values are conceptually compatible and can be operationalised to foster student engagement, creativity, and accessibility. Educators leveraged local assets and co-created learning experiences perceived as engaging and sustainable. However, challenges emerged in applying these values consistently across contexts, particularly in balancing playfulness with curricular demands and material constraints. Variation in expert evaluations also highlighted the difficulty of assessing pedagogies that resist standardisation and emphasise exploratory or affective outcomes. These insights underscore the need for more nuanced evaluation frameworks, clearer design guidance, and sustained professional and institutional support.
While student learning outcomes were not directly measured, the study offers a novel replicable framework for value-led playful and frugal educational design. It contributes to global discussions on inclusive and sustainable pedagogy by demonstrating how playful and frugal design logics can inform ethical, adaptive, and creative learning, especially in communities where resources are limited but ingenuity and resilience are abundant.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 101923 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| Journal | Social Sciences & Humanities Open |
| Volume | 12 |
| Early online date | 26 Aug 2025 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 26 Aug 2025 |
Bibliographical note
This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)Funding
Frugality was especially prominent in settings where material and financial resources were limited. Educators, particularly those fromMalaysia, described the need to be inventive due to the scarcity of institutional funding and limited access to commercial teaching tools. They addressed this by drawing on natural and readily available resources, and by reusing household materials creatively. These practices supported both environmental sustainability and educational accessibility, enabling teachers to reduce reliance on costly infrastructure and instead embed resourcefulness into learning. In some cases, this approach encouraged cross-disciplinary thinking, as educators had to align material choices with science, engineering, or mathematical principles using what was available locally. Such practices are emblematic of frugal innovation approaches, where resource constraints fuel creativity and local adaptation (Masters, 2024; Radjou & Prabhu, 2014), where educators often leverage accessible materials to create meaningful learning designs (Tan & Minoi, 2023).This study supports the potential of a playful and frugal design framework to foster engagement, sustainability, and creativity in STEM education. Future work could develop toolkits and professional development resources to help educators adopt these values more systematically. Experimental and longitudinal studies could further investigate the impact of these designs on learning outcomes, equity, and teacher agency. Finally, the integration of circular economy principles (Stahel, 2016), such as responsible reuse and disposal of repurposed materials, deserves greater attention as part of sustainable educational design.The work was supported by the Economic and Social Research Council [Grant number: ES/T004789/1).
| Funders | Funder number |
|---|---|
| Economic and Social Research Council | ES/T004789/1 |
| Economic and Social Research Council |
Keywords
- Playful learning
- Frugal education
- STEM education
- Inclusive education
- Sustainable learning
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Playful and Frugal Learning Design: A Value-Based Approach to Inclusive and Sustainable STEM Education'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Projects
- 1 Finished
-
A Community-A Community-Centred Educational Model for developing Social Resilience (ACES): Playfulness towards an inclusive, safe and resilient society
Arnab, S. (Principal Investigator), Tomlins, R. (Co-Investigator), Wimpenny, K. (Co-Investigator), Masters, A. (Research Assistant), Clarke, S. (Researcher) & Morini, L. (Researcher)
1/02/20 → 31/01/23
Project: Research
Prizes
-
QS Reimagine Awards 2023 for Sustainability Education
Arnab, S. (Recipient), Masters, A. (Recipient), Beaufoy, J. (Recipient), Wimpenny, K. (Recipient), Morini, L. (Recipient) & Tomlins, R. (Recipient), Dec 2023
Prize: Prize (including medals and awards)