Photomaps: A Visual Taxonomy

Rob Tovey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Multiple viewpoint photo composites, or photomaps, are commonplace, but critically and popularly overlooked. They bring together principles from information graphics
and geographic visualisation and combine them with the image-making technologies
of photography. Well known examples include the ubiquitous panorama and aerial composites such as Google Map’s satellite view. Forerunners are as old as photography itself including examples from Henry Fox-Talbot and Eadweard Muybridge. 
In this visual essay the formal possibilities of photomaps are explored through practical enquiry. Alternate visual schemas are used to arrange photographic information with the purpose of setting out some of the parameters and possibilities of this mode of representation. What follows is a visual taxonomy of photomaps covering cartographic, scanned, diagrammatic, peripheral and topological approaches. This is not an exhaustive list by any means but does set out the territory for what has been an under-theorised visual approach. 
Texts on the subject are limited, with the majority focusing on technological innovations in optics and compositing, geographic information systems (GIS) and, less often, Google Earth. The only major texts to explicitly address photo-composite representations include Nicholas Felton’s recent PhotoViz: Visualizing information through photography (2016) and Dawn Ades’ Photomontage (1976), both of which have a very different emphasis to this study.  
Rather than frame the photomap as an isolated visual mode, it is conceptualised here as being part of an expanded field of visual media, which merges into photography, film, digital imagery and information graphics. George Baker in ‘Photography’s Expanded Field’ argues that the blurring of boundaries between diverse visual forms has meant ‘photography has been thoroughly transformed today’ but that ‘something like a photographic effect still remains’ (2005: 123). This is echoed in statements from Costello (2007), Fried (2008) and Green and Lowry (2005). This ‘photographic effect’ is present, and indeed fundamental, to photomaps. Baker sets out an expansive structure, arguing: ‘Perhaps, indeed, photography’s expanded field... might even have to be imagined as a group of expanded fields, multiple sets of oppositions and conjugations, rather than any singular operation’ (ibid: 124, his emphasis). It is within this framework that the study is situated, with the “photomap” at that liminal point between photography, information graphics and mapping, and it is the parameters of this expanded field that are explored here.
LanguageEnglish
Pages209-220
Number of pages12
JournalVisual Communication
Volume17
Issue number2
Early online date23 Jan 2018
DOIs
StateE-pub ahead of print - 23 Jan 2018

Fingerprint

Photography
Taxonomies
photography
taxonomy
search engine
Composite materials
Taxonomy
technical innovation
Geographic information systems
visualization
Optics
information system
opposition
Visualization
Innovation
Earth (planet)
Satellites
Antennas

Keywords

  • digital composite
  • information design
  • mapping
  • photography
  • photomap
  • representation

Cite this

Photomaps: A Visual Taxonomy. / Tovey, Rob.

In: Visual Communication, Vol. 17, No. 2, 23.01.2018, p. 209-220.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tovey, R 2018, 'Photomaps: A Visual Taxonomy' Visual Communication, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 209-220. DOI: 10.1177/1470357217746028
Tovey R. Photomaps: A Visual Taxonomy. Visual Communication. 2018 Jan 23;17(2):209-220. Available from, DOI: 10.1177/1470357217746028
Tovey, Rob. / Photomaps: A Visual Taxonomy. In: Visual Communication. 2018 ; Vol. 17, No. 2. pp. 209-220
@article{3759464927fc4ef08a43ab197d43ab55,
title = "Photomaps: A Visual Taxonomy",
abstract = "Multiple viewpoint photo composites, or photomaps, are commonplace, but critically and popularly overlooked. They bring together principles from information graphics and geographic visualisation and combine them with the image-making technologies of photography. Well known examples include the ubiquitous panorama and aerial composites such as Google Map’s satellite view. Forerunners are as old as photography itself including examples from Henry Fox-Talbot and Eadweard Muybridge. In this visual essay the formal possibilities of photomaps are explored through practical enquiry. Alternate visual schemas are used to arrange photographic information with the purpose of setting out some of the parameters and possibilities of this mode of representation. What follows is a visual taxonomy of photomaps covering cartographic, scanned, diagrammatic, peripheral and topological approaches. This is not an exhaustive list by any means but does set out the territory for what has been an under-theorised visual approach. Texts on the subject are limited, with the majority focusing on technological innovations in optics and compositing, geographic information systems (GIS) and, less often, Google Earth. The only major texts to explicitly address photo-composite representations include Nicholas Felton’s recent PhotoViz: Visualizing information through photography (2016) and Dawn Ades’ Photomontage (1976), both of which have a very different emphasis to this study.  Rather than frame the photomap as an isolated visual mode, it is conceptualised here as being part of an expanded field of visual media, which merges into photography, film, digital imagery and information graphics. George Baker in ‘Photography’s Expanded Field’ argues that the blurring of boundaries between diverse visual forms has meant ‘photography has been thoroughly transformed today’ but that ‘something like a photographic effect still remains’ (2005: 123). This is echoed in statements from Costello (2007), Fried (2008) and Green and Lowry (2005). This ‘photographic effect’ is present, and indeed fundamental, to photomaps. Baker sets out an expansive structure, arguing: ‘Perhaps, indeed, photography’s expanded field... might even have to be imagined as a group of expanded fields, multiple sets of oppositions and conjugations, rather than any singular operation’ (ibid: 124, his emphasis). It is within this framework that the study is situated, with the “photomap” at that liminal point between photography, information graphics and mapping, and it is the parameters of this expanded field that are explored here.",
keywords = "digital composite, information design, mapping, photography, photomap, representation",
author = "Rob Tovey",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "23",
doi = "10.1177/1470357217746028",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "209--220",
journal = "Visual Communication",
issn = "1470-3572",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Photomaps: A Visual Taxonomy

AU - Tovey,Rob

PY - 2018/1/23

Y1 - 2018/1/23

N2 - Multiple viewpoint photo composites, or photomaps, are commonplace, but critically and popularly overlooked. They bring together principles from information graphics and geographic visualisation and combine them with the image-making technologies of photography. Well known examples include the ubiquitous panorama and aerial composites such as Google Map’s satellite view. Forerunners are as old as photography itself including examples from Henry Fox-Talbot and Eadweard Muybridge. In this visual essay the formal possibilities of photomaps are explored through practical enquiry. Alternate visual schemas are used to arrange photographic information with the purpose of setting out some of the parameters and possibilities of this mode of representation. What follows is a visual taxonomy of photomaps covering cartographic, scanned, diagrammatic, peripheral and topological approaches. This is not an exhaustive list by any means but does set out the territory for what has been an under-theorised visual approach. Texts on the subject are limited, with the majority focusing on technological innovations in optics and compositing, geographic information systems (GIS) and, less often, Google Earth. The only major texts to explicitly address photo-composite representations include Nicholas Felton’s recent PhotoViz: Visualizing information through photography (2016) and Dawn Ades’ Photomontage (1976), both of which have a very different emphasis to this study.  Rather than frame the photomap as an isolated visual mode, it is conceptualised here as being part of an expanded field of visual media, which merges into photography, film, digital imagery and information graphics. George Baker in ‘Photography’s Expanded Field’ argues that the blurring of boundaries between diverse visual forms has meant ‘photography has been thoroughly transformed today’ but that ‘something like a photographic effect still remains’ (2005: 123). This is echoed in statements from Costello (2007), Fried (2008) and Green and Lowry (2005). This ‘photographic effect’ is present, and indeed fundamental, to photomaps. Baker sets out an expansive structure, arguing: ‘Perhaps, indeed, photography’s expanded field... might even have to be imagined as a group of expanded fields, multiple sets of oppositions and conjugations, rather than any singular operation’ (ibid: 124, his emphasis). It is within this framework that the study is situated, with the “photomap” at that liminal point between photography, information graphics and mapping, and it is the parameters of this expanded field that are explored here.

AB - Multiple viewpoint photo composites, or photomaps, are commonplace, but critically and popularly overlooked. They bring together principles from information graphics and geographic visualisation and combine them with the image-making technologies of photography. Well known examples include the ubiquitous panorama and aerial composites such as Google Map’s satellite view. Forerunners are as old as photography itself including examples from Henry Fox-Talbot and Eadweard Muybridge. In this visual essay the formal possibilities of photomaps are explored through practical enquiry. Alternate visual schemas are used to arrange photographic information with the purpose of setting out some of the parameters and possibilities of this mode of representation. What follows is a visual taxonomy of photomaps covering cartographic, scanned, diagrammatic, peripheral and topological approaches. This is not an exhaustive list by any means but does set out the territory for what has been an under-theorised visual approach. Texts on the subject are limited, with the majority focusing on technological innovations in optics and compositing, geographic information systems (GIS) and, less often, Google Earth. The only major texts to explicitly address photo-composite representations include Nicholas Felton’s recent PhotoViz: Visualizing information through photography (2016) and Dawn Ades’ Photomontage (1976), both of which have a very different emphasis to this study.  Rather than frame the photomap as an isolated visual mode, it is conceptualised here as being part of an expanded field of visual media, which merges into photography, film, digital imagery and information graphics. George Baker in ‘Photography’s Expanded Field’ argues that the blurring of boundaries between diverse visual forms has meant ‘photography has been thoroughly transformed today’ but that ‘something like a photographic effect still remains’ (2005: 123). This is echoed in statements from Costello (2007), Fried (2008) and Green and Lowry (2005). This ‘photographic effect’ is present, and indeed fundamental, to photomaps. Baker sets out an expansive structure, arguing: ‘Perhaps, indeed, photography’s expanded field... might even have to be imagined as a group of expanded fields, multiple sets of oppositions and conjugations, rather than any singular operation’ (ibid: 124, his emphasis). It is within this framework that the study is situated, with the “photomap” at that liminal point between photography, information graphics and mapping, and it is the parameters of this expanded field that are explored here.

KW - digital composite

KW - information design

KW - mapping

KW - photography

KW - photomap

KW - representation

U2 - 10.1177/1470357217746028

DO - 10.1177/1470357217746028

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 209

EP - 220

JO - Visual Communication

T2 - Visual Communication

JF - Visual Communication

SN - 1470-3572

IS - 2

ER -