TY - JOUR
T1 - Photography and the Thin Present: Barthes, Deleuze and the Time of Portrayal
AU - Sutton, Damian
N1 - This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/),
which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium,
provided the original work is properly cited..
PY - 2022/4
Y1 - 2022/4
N2 - The temporal relationship we have with a portrait, its photographer and sitter, is a phenomenology of the pose – as both portrayal and self-portrayal – in photographic media. The portrait preserves the present on behalf of the future, which looks back at its past. The catastrophe of photography is its emptying out of time, noted most famously in Barthes’ reading of a portrait by Alexander Gardner. However, the recorded, remembered, and shared image practices in contemporary visual culture reveal an attenuation of time that is at once ‘now’ and ‘then’ as a distinct affective experience that is understandable, legible, and exchangeable. It is full, not empty, but thinned rather than lost. This thin present needs a phenomenology that accounts for combination and duplication, as well as the sensation of loss and separation, as direct experience. I propose that a dialogue between Barthes’ work and Deleuze’s pragmatics allows us to read the time of portrayal as haecceity, where we describe, remember, and reproduce affect as a thing in itself, with its own uniqueness.
AB - The temporal relationship we have with a portrait, its photographer and sitter, is a phenomenology of the pose – as both portrayal and self-portrayal – in photographic media. The portrait preserves the present on behalf of the future, which looks back at its past. The catastrophe of photography is its emptying out of time, noted most famously in Barthes’ reading of a portrait by Alexander Gardner. However, the recorded, remembered, and shared image practices in contemporary visual culture reveal an attenuation of time that is at once ‘now’ and ‘then’ as a distinct affective experience that is understandable, legible, and exchangeable. It is full, not empty, but thinned rather than lost. This thin present needs a phenomenology that accounts for combination and duplication, as well as the sensation of loss and separation, as direct experience. I propose that a dialogue between Barthes’ work and Deleuze’s pragmatics allows us to read the time of portrayal as haecceity, where we describe, remember, and reproduce affect as a thing in itself, with its own uniqueness.
KW - Barthes
KW - Deleuze
KW - Portraiture
KW - Photography
KW - Time
KW - haecceity
M3 - Article
SN - 2182-3294
VL - 11
SP - 7
EP - 16
JO - Revista de História de Arte - Série W
JF - Revista de História de Arte - Série W
ER -