Photography and the Thin Present: Barthes, Deleuze and the Time of Portrayal

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    48 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    The temporal relationship we have with a portrait, its photographer and sitter, is a phenomenology of the pose – as both portrayal and self-portrayal – in photographic media. The portrait preserves the present on behalf of the future, which looks back at its past. The catastrophe of photography is its emptying out of time, noted most famously in Barthes’ reading of a portrait by Alexander Gardner.

    However, the recorded, remembered, and shared image practices in contemporary visual culture reveal an attenuation of time that is at once ‘now’ and ‘then’ as a distinct affective experience that is understandable, legible, and exchangeable. It is full, not empty, but thinned rather than lost. This thin present needs a phenomenology that accounts for combination and duplication, as well as the sensation of loss and separation, as direct experience. I propose that a dialogue between Barthes’ work and Deleuze’s pragmatics allows us to read the time of portrayal as haecceity, where we describe, remember, and reproduce affect as a thing in itself, with its own uniqueness.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)7-16
    Number of pages10
    JournalRevista de História de Arte - Série W
    Volume11
    Publication statusPublished - Apr 2022

    Bibliographical note

    This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative
    Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/),
    which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium,
    provided the original work is properly cited..

    Keywords

    • Barthes
    • Deleuze
    • Portraiture
    • Photography
    • Time
    • haecceity

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Visual Arts and Performing Arts

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Photography and the Thin Present: Barthes, Deleuze and the Time of Portrayal'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this