TY - JOUR
T1 - Photocatalytic foams for water treatment
T2 - A systematic review and meta-analysis
AU - Warren, Zachary
AU - Tasso Guaraldo, Thais
AU - Martins, Alysson Stefan
AU - Wenk, Jannis
AU - Mattia, Davide
PY - 2023/2
Y1 - 2023/2
N2 - Photocatalysis has proven to be highly effective for the removal of recalcitrant organic micropollutants at the lab scale. However, drawbacks such as the need for downstream removal of nanoparticle slurries and low surface areas of immobilised catalyst have, so far, hindered large-scale application. Photocatalytic foams have the potential to address these issues and advance the field towards large scale deployment. This review offers the first comprehensive overview of the state-of-the-art in this growing research field while simultaneously addressing two key issues which are slowing down further progress: The lack of classification nomenclature for foams, particularly regarding pore size and production method, and the use of kinetics as the defining feature of a photocatalyst, when alternate figures of merit, such electrical and quantum efficiencies, may be more appropriate. These were particular evident from a semi-quantitative comparison of the literature reported here, which highlighted the need for standardisation of experimental methods within the field. Finally future perspectives and best practices are discussed and recommended.
AB - Photocatalysis has proven to be highly effective for the removal of recalcitrant organic micropollutants at the lab scale. However, drawbacks such as the need for downstream removal of nanoparticle slurries and low surface areas of immobilised catalyst have, so far, hindered large-scale application. Photocatalytic foams have the potential to address these issues and advance the field towards large scale deployment. This review offers the first comprehensive overview of the state-of-the-art in this growing research field while simultaneously addressing two key issues which are slowing down further progress: The lack of classification nomenclature for foams, particularly regarding pore size and production method, and the use of kinetics as the defining feature of a photocatalyst, when alternate figures of merit, such electrical and quantum efficiencies, may be more appropriate. These were particular evident from a semi-quantitative comparison of the literature reported here, which highlighted the need for standardisation of experimental methods within the field. Finally future perspectives and best practices are discussed and recommended.
KW - Foams
KW - Photocatalysis
KW - Photocatalysts
KW - Water treatment
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85145883609&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jece.2022.109238
DO - 10.1016/j.jece.2022.109238
M3 - Review article
SN - 2213-3437
VL - 11
JO - Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering
JF - Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering
IS - 1
M1 - 109238
ER -