Persistence and Resistance of Harmful Traditional Practices (HTPs) Perpetuated against Girls in Africa and Asia.

Jennifer Glover, Helen Liebling, Simon Goodman, Hazel Barrett

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

32 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Harmful traditional practices (HTPs) are deeply entrenched behaviours or actions that violate the human rights of affected individuals. They have negative consequences on the physical and psychological health, social rights and political equality of affected individuals and their communities. Despite legislation making HTPs illegal in many countries, these practices continue today, causing considerable health risks to women and girls. Whilst studies have sought to understand factors perpetuating different HTPs, a paucity of reviews synthesises these findings. Aims: The aim of this review is to consider son preference, female genital mutilation, and child marriage in relation to their persistence, including the underlying and other factors that facilitate resistance and control mechanisms. Method: Using PRISMA guidelines, a systematic literature review of 21 research studies. Results: Women of practising communities identified educational status of women, residential location, economic status, and a family history of practising HTPs as socio-economic factors perpetuating HTPs. Negative physical health consequences and women's autonomy were identified as facilitating resistance to HTPs, whilst religion and patriarchy were identified as mechanisms that prevented resistance to HTPs. Policy implications are considered.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)44-64
Number of pages21
JournalJournal of International Women's Studies
Volume19
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 28 Feb 2018

Fingerprint

persistence
social rights
health consequences
patriarchy
health risk
genealogy
economic factors
community
equality
human rights
marriage
autonomy
legislation
Religion
health
economics

Keywords

  • Africa/Asia
  • Child marriage
  • Female genital mutilation
  • Son preference
  • Systematic review

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gender Studies

Cite this

Persistence and Resistance of Harmful Traditional Practices (HTPs) Perpetuated against Girls in Africa and Asia. / Glover, Jennifer; Liebling, Helen; Goodman, Simon; Barrett, Hazel.

In: Journal of International Women's Studies, Vol. 19, No. 2, 28.02.2018, p. 44-64.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9f3f54d1ca224e7d9c90e583202d0a0e,
title = "Persistence and Resistance of Harmful Traditional Practices (HTPs) Perpetuated against Girls in Africa and Asia.",
abstract = "Background: Harmful traditional practices (HTPs) are deeply entrenched behaviours or actions that violate the human rights of affected individuals. They have negative consequences on the physical and psychological health, social rights and political equality of affected individuals and their communities. Despite legislation making HTPs illegal in many countries, these practices continue today, causing considerable health risks to women and girls. Whilst studies have sought to understand factors perpetuating different HTPs, a paucity of reviews synthesises these findings. Aims: The aim of this review is to consider son preference, female genital mutilation, and child marriage in relation to their persistence, including the underlying and other factors that facilitate resistance and control mechanisms. Method: Using PRISMA guidelines, a systematic literature review of 21 research studies. Results: Women of practising communities identified educational status of women, residential location, economic status, and a family history of practising HTPs as socio-economic factors perpetuating HTPs. Negative physical health consequences and women's autonomy were identified as facilitating resistance to HTPs, whilst religion and patriarchy were identified as mechanisms that prevented resistance to HTPs. Policy implications are considered.",
keywords = "Africa/Asia, Child marriage, Female genital mutilation, Son preference, Systematic review",
author = "Jennifer Glover and Helen Liebling and Simon Goodman and Hazel Barrett",
year = "2018",
month = "2",
day = "28",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "44--64",
journal = "Journal of International Women's Studies",
issn = "1539-8706",
publisher = "Bridgewater State College",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Persistence and Resistance of Harmful Traditional Practices (HTPs) Perpetuated against Girls in Africa and Asia.

AU - Glover, Jennifer

AU - Liebling, Helen

AU - Goodman, Simon

AU - Barrett, Hazel

PY - 2018/2/28

Y1 - 2018/2/28

N2 - Background: Harmful traditional practices (HTPs) are deeply entrenched behaviours or actions that violate the human rights of affected individuals. They have negative consequences on the physical and psychological health, social rights and political equality of affected individuals and their communities. Despite legislation making HTPs illegal in many countries, these practices continue today, causing considerable health risks to women and girls. Whilst studies have sought to understand factors perpetuating different HTPs, a paucity of reviews synthesises these findings. Aims: The aim of this review is to consider son preference, female genital mutilation, and child marriage in relation to their persistence, including the underlying and other factors that facilitate resistance and control mechanisms. Method: Using PRISMA guidelines, a systematic literature review of 21 research studies. Results: Women of practising communities identified educational status of women, residential location, economic status, and a family history of practising HTPs as socio-economic factors perpetuating HTPs. Negative physical health consequences and women's autonomy were identified as facilitating resistance to HTPs, whilst religion and patriarchy were identified as mechanisms that prevented resistance to HTPs. Policy implications are considered.

AB - Background: Harmful traditional practices (HTPs) are deeply entrenched behaviours or actions that violate the human rights of affected individuals. They have negative consequences on the physical and psychological health, social rights and political equality of affected individuals and their communities. Despite legislation making HTPs illegal in many countries, these practices continue today, causing considerable health risks to women and girls. Whilst studies have sought to understand factors perpetuating different HTPs, a paucity of reviews synthesises these findings. Aims: The aim of this review is to consider son preference, female genital mutilation, and child marriage in relation to their persistence, including the underlying and other factors that facilitate resistance and control mechanisms. Method: Using PRISMA guidelines, a systematic literature review of 21 research studies. Results: Women of practising communities identified educational status of women, residential location, economic status, and a family history of practising HTPs as socio-economic factors perpetuating HTPs. Negative physical health consequences and women's autonomy were identified as facilitating resistance to HTPs, whilst religion and patriarchy were identified as mechanisms that prevented resistance to HTPs. Policy implications are considered.

KW - Africa/Asia

KW - Child marriage

KW - Female genital mutilation

KW - Son preference

KW - Systematic review

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85041930021&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 44

EP - 64

JO - Journal of International Women's Studies

JF - Journal of International Women's Studies

SN - 1539-8706

IS - 2

ER -