Peripherality and university collaboration: Evidence from rural SMEs in the UK

Andrew Johnston; Daniel  Prokop

doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.08.014

Peripherality and university collaboration: Evidence from rural SMEs in the UK

Andrew Johnston, Daniel Prokop

CBL International Centre for Transformational Entrepreneurship (ICTE)

Cardiff University

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

54 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

While innovation is viewed as crucial means of promoting competitiveness of rural SMEs, rural areas can be blighted by an ‘underdeveloped innovation environment’. Perhaps due to an urban bias in innovation research, open innovation through university collaboration among rural SMEs has not been extensively examined. Using a dataset of 880 rural SMEs from the UK, the paper suggests that rural SMEs are less likely to collaborate with a university than urban SMEs. Furthermore, higher numbers of employees and export revenues have a positive influence on the propensity to collaborate with a university. In addition, collaborating with organisations such as private laboratories and public sector research institutes increases the propensity to engage in university collaboration.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	298-306
Number of pages	9
Journal	Journal of Rural Studies
Volume	88
Early online date	16 Aug 2021
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.08.014
Publication status	Published - 1 Dec 2021

Bibliographical note

© 2021, Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

Copyright © and Moral Rights are retained by the author(s) and/ or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This item cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder(s). The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.

This document is the author’s post-print version, incorporating any revisions agreed during the peer-review process. Some differences between the published version and this version may remain and you are advised to consult the published version if you wish to cite from it.

Keywords

Rural SMEs
University-industry links
University collaboration
Open innovation
Rural development

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Geography, Planning and Development
Development
Sociology and Political Science

Access to Document

10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.08.014

Post-PrintAccepted author manuscript, 1.69 MBLicence: CC BY-NC-ND

Cite this

@article{b3fcca0f28c848d9b91e54f70d2b46f1,

title = "Peripherality and university collaboration: Evidence from rural SMEs in the UK",

abstract = "While innovation is viewed as crucial means of promoting competitiveness of rural SMEs, rural areas can be blighted by an {\textquoteleft}underdeveloped innovation environment{\textquoteright}. Perhaps due to an urban bias in innovation research, open innovation through university collaboration among rural SMEs has not been extensively examined. Using a dataset of 880 rural SMEs from the UK, the paper suggests that rural SMEs are less likely to collaborate with a university than urban SMEs. Furthermore, higher numbers of employees and export revenues have a positive influence on the propensity to collaborate with a university. In addition, collaborating with organisations such as private laboratories and public sector research institutes increases the propensity to engage in university collaboration.",

keywords = "Rural SMEs, University-industry links, University collaboration, Open innovation, Rural development",

author = "Andrew Johnston and Daniel Prokop",

note = "{\textcopyright} 2021, Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Copyright {\textcopyright} and Moral Rights are retained by the author(s) and/ or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This item cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder(s). The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. This document is the author{\textquoteright}s post-print version, incorporating any revisions agreed during the peer-review process. Some differences between the published version and this version may remain and you are advised to consult the published version if you wish to cite from it. ",

year = "2021",

month = dec,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.08.014",

language = "English",

volume = "88",

pages = "298--306",

journal = "Journal of Rural Studies",

issn = "0743-0167",

publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Peripherality and university collaboration

T2 - Evidence from rural SMEs in the UK

AU - Johnston, Andrew

AU - Prokop, Daniel

N1 - © 2021, Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Copyright © and Moral Rights are retained by the author(s) and/ or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This item cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder(s). The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. This document is the author’s post-print version, incorporating any revisions agreed during the peer-review process. Some differences between the published version and this version may remain and you are advised to consult the published version if you wish to cite from it.

PY - 2021/12/1

Y1 - 2021/12/1

N2 - While innovation is viewed as crucial means of promoting competitiveness of rural SMEs, rural areas can be blighted by an ‘underdeveloped innovation environment’. Perhaps due to an urban bias in innovation research, open innovation through university collaboration among rural SMEs has not been extensively examined. Using a dataset of 880 rural SMEs from the UK, the paper suggests that rural SMEs are less likely to collaborate with a university than urban SMEs. Furthermore, higher numbers of employees and export revenues have a positive influence on the propensity to collaborate with a university. In addition, collaborating with organisations such as private laboratories and public sector research institutes increases the propensity to engage in university collaboration.

AB - While innovation is viewed as crucial means of promoting competitiveness of rural SMEs, rural areas can be blighted by an ‘underdeveloped innovation environment’. Perhaps due to an urban bias in innovation research, open innovation through university collaboration among rural SMEs has not been extensively examined. Using a dataset of 880 rural SMEs from the UK, the paper suggests that rural SMEs are less likely to collaborate with a university than urban SMEs. Furthermore, higher numbers of employees and export revenues have a positive influence on the propensity to collaborate with a university. In addition, collaborating with organisations such as private laboratories and public sector research institutes increases the propensity to engage in university collaboration.

KW - Rural SMEs

KW - University-industry links

KW - University collaboration

KW - Open innovation

KW - Rural development

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85112858290&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.08.014

DO - 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.08.014

M3 - Article

SN - 0743-0167

VL - 88

SP - 298

EP - 306

JO - Journal of Rural Studies

JF - Journal of Rural Studies

ER -

Peripherality and university collaboration: Evidence from rural SMEs in the UK

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this