Peak power prediction in junior basketballers: Comparing linear and allometric models

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    7 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Equations, commonly used to predict peak power from jump height, have relied on linear additive models that are biologically unsound beyond the range of observations because of high negative intercept values. This study explored the utility of allometric multiplicative modeling to better predict peak power in adolescent basketball players. Seventy-seven elite junior basketball players (62 adolescent boys, 15 adolescent girls, age = 16.8 ± 0.8 years) performed 3 counter movement jumps (CMJs) on a force platform. Both linear and multiplicative models were then used to determine their efficacy. Four previously published linear equations were significantly associated with actual peak power (all p <0.01), although here were significant differences between actual and estimated peak power using the SJ and CMJ equations by Sayers (both p <0.001). Allometric modeling was used to determine an alternative biologically sound equation which was more strongly associated with (r = 0.886, p <0.001), and not significantly different to (p > 0.05), actual peak power and predicted 77.9% of the variance in actual peak power (adjusted R2 = 0.779, p <0.001). Exponents close to 1 for body mass and CMJ height indicated that peak power could also be determined from the product of body mass and CMJ height. This equation was significantly associated (r = 0.871, p <0.001) with, and not significantly different to, actual peak power (adjusted R2 = 0.756, p > 0.05) and offered a more accurate estimation of peak power than previously validated linear additive models examined in this study. The allometric model determined from this study or the multiplicative model (body mass × CMJ height) provides biologically sound models to accurately estimate peak power in elite adolescent basketballers that are more accurate than equations based on linear additive models. © 2013 National Strength and Conditioning Association.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)597-603
    JournalJournal of Strength and Conditioning Research
    Volume27
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2013

    Fingerprint

    Linear Models
    Basketball

    Bibliographical note

    The full text of this item is not available from the repository.
    This is a non-final version of an article published in final form in: Duncan, M.J. , Hankey, J. , Lyons, M. , James, R.S. and Nevill, A.M. (2013) Peak power prediction in junior basketballers: Comparing linear and allometric models. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, volume 27 (3): 597-603.

    Keywords

    • allometric modelling
    • explosive power
    • force platform
    • vertical jump

    Cite this

    Peak power prediction in junior basketballers: Comparing linear and allometric models. / Duncan, Michael J.; Hankey, Joanne; Lyons, M.; James, Rob S.; Nevill, A.M.

    In: Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, Vol. 27, No. 3, 2013, p. 597-603.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{4f6f82321d374d95b80a87f4dbcf2d6d,
    title = "Peak power prediction in junior basketballers: Comparing linear and allometric models",
    abstract = "Equations, commonly used to predict peak power from jump height, have relied on linear additive models that are biologically unsound beyond the range of observations because of high negative intercept values. This study explored the utility of allometric multiplicative modeling to better predict peak power in adolescent basketball players. Seventy-seven elite junior basketball players (62 adolescent boys, 15 adolescent girls, age = 16.8 ± 0.8 years) performed 3 counter movement jumps (CMJs) on a force platform. Both linear and multiplicative models were then used to determine their efficacy. Four previously published linear equations were significantly associated with actual peak power (all p <0.01), although here were significant differences between actual and estimated peak power using the SJ and CMJ equations by Sayers (both p <0.001). Allometric modeling was used to determine an alternative biologically sound equation which was more strongly associated with (r = 0.886, p <0.001), and not significantly different to (p > 0.05), actual peak power and predicted 77.9{\%} of the variance in actual peak power (adjusted R2 = 0.779, p <0.001). Exponents close to 1 for body mass and CMJ height indicated that peak power could also be determined from the product of body mass and CMJ height. This equation was significantly associated (r = 0.871, p <0.001) with, and not significantly different to, actual peak power (adjusted R2 = 0.756, p > 0.05) and offered a more accurate estimation of peak power than previously validated linear additive models examined in this study. The allometric model determined from this study or the multiplicative model (body mass × CMJ height) provides biologically sound models to accurately estimate peak power in elite adolescent basketballers that are more accurate than equations based on linear additive models. {\circledC} 2013 National Strength and Conditioning Association.",
    keywords = "allometric modelling, explosive power, force platform, vertical jump",
    author = "Duncan, {Michael J.} and Joanne Hankey and M. Lyons and James, {Rob S.} and A.M. Nevill",
    note = "The full text of this item is not available from the repository. This is a non-final version of an article published in final form in: Duncan, M.J. , Hankey, J. , Lyons, M. , James, R.S. and Nevill, A.M. (2013) Peak power prediction in junior basketballers: Comparing linear and allometric models. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, volume 27 (3): 597-603.",
    year = "2013",
    doi = "10.1519/JSC.0b013e31825d97ac",
    language = "English",
    volume = "27",
    pages = "597--603",
    journal = "Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research",
    issn = "1064-8011",
    publisher = "Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins",
    number = "3",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Peak power prediction in junior basketballers: Comparing linear and allometric models

    AU - Duncan, Michael J.

    AU - Hankey, Joanne

    AU - Lyons, M.

    AU - James, Rob S.

    AU - Nevill, A.M.

    N1 - The full text of this item is not available from the repository. This is a non-final version of an article published in final form in: Duncan, M.J. , Hankey, J. , Lyons, M. , James, R.S. and Nevill, A.M. (2013) Peak power prediction in junior basketballers: Comparing linear and allometric models. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, volume 27 (3): 597-603.

    PY - 2013

    Y1 - 2013

    N2 - Equations, commonly used to predict peak power from jump height, have relied on linear additive models that are biologically unsound beyond the range of observations because of high negative intercept values. This study explored the utility of allometric multiplicative modeling to better predict peak power in adolescent basketball players. Seventy-seven elite junior basketball players (62 adolescent boys, 15 adolescent girls, age = 16.8 ± 0.8 years) performed 3 counter movement jumps (CMJs) on a force platform. Both linear and multiplicative models were then used to determine their efficacy. Four previously published linear equations were significantly associated with actual peak power (all p <0.01), although here were significant differences between actual and estimated peak power using the SJ and CMJ equations by Sayers (both p <0.001). Allometric modeling was used to determine an alternative biologically sound equation which was more strongly associated with (r = 0.886, p <0.001), and not significantly different to (p > 0.05), actual peak power and predicted 77.9% of the variance in actual peak power (adjusted R2 = 0.779, p <0.001). Exponents close to 1 for body mass and CMJ height indicated that peak power could also be determined from the product of body mass and CMJ height. This equation was significantly associated (r = 0.871, p <0.001) with, and not significantly different to, actual peak power (adjusted R2 = 0.756, p > 0.05) and offered a more accurate estimation of peak power than previously validated linear additive models examined in this study. The allometric model determined from this study or the multiplicative model (body mass × CMJ height) provides biologically sound models to accurately estimate peak power in elite adolescent basketballers that are more accurate than equations based on linear additive models. © 2013 National Strength and Conditioning Association.

    AB - Equations, commonly used to predict peak power from jump height, have relied on linear additive models that are biologically unsound beyond the range of observations because of high negative intercept values. This study explored the utility of allometric multiplicative modeling to better predict peak power in adolescent basketball players. Seventy-seven elite junior basketball players (62 adolescent boys, 15 adolescent girls, age = 16.8 ± 0.8 years) performed 3 counter movement jumps (CMJs) on a force platform. Both linear and multiplicative models were then used to determine their efficacy. Four previously published linear equations were significantly associated with actual peak power (all p <0.01), although here were significant differences between actual and estimated peak power using the SJ and CMJ equations by Sayers (both p <0.001). Allometric modeling was used to determine an alternative biologically sound equation which was more strongly associated with (r = 0.886, p <0.001), and not significantly different to (p > 0.05), actual peak power and predicted 77.9% of the variance in actual peak power (adjusted R2 = 0.779, p <0.001). Exponents close to 1 for body mass and CMJ height indicated that peak power could also be determined from the product of body mass and CMJ height. This equation was significantly associated (r = 0.871, p <0.001) with, and not significantly different to, actual peak power (adjusted R2 = 0.756, p > 0.05) and offered a more accurate estimation of peak power than previously validated linear additive models examined in this study. The allometric model determined from this study or the multiplicative model (body mass × CMJ height) provides biologically sound models to accurately estimate peak power in elite adolescent basketballers that are more accurate than equations based on linear additive models. © 2013 National Strength and Conditioning Association.

    KW - allometric modelling

    KW - explosive power

    KW - force platform

    KW - vertical jump

    U2 - 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31825d97ac

    DO - 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31825d97ac

    M3 - Article

    VL - 27

    SP - 597

    EP - 603

    JO - Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research

    JF - Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research

    SN - 1064-8011

    IS - 3

    ER -