Payday lending in the UK: the regul(aris)ation of a necessary evil?

Karen Rowlingson, Lindsey Appleyard, Jodi Gardner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)
51 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Concern about the increasing use of payday lending led the UK's Financial Conduct Authority to introduce landmark reforms in 2014/15. While these reforms have generally been welcomed as a way of curbing 'extortionate' and 'predatory' lending, this paper presents a more nuanced picture based on a theoretically-informed analysis of the growth and nature of payday lending combined with original and rigorous qualitative interviews with customers. We argue that payday lending has grown as a result of three major and inter-related trends: growing income insecurity for people both in and out of work; cuts in state welfare provision; and increasing financialisation. Recent reforms of payday lending do nothing to tackle these root causes. Our research also makes a major contribution to debates about the 'everyday life' of financialisation by focusing on the 'lived experience' of borrowers. We show that, contrary to the rather simplistic picture presented by the media and many campaigners, various aspects of payday lending are actually welcomed by customers, given the situations they are in. Tighter regulation may therefore have negative consequences for some. More generally, we argue that the regul(aris)ation of payday lending reinforces the shift in the role of the state from provider/redistributor to regulator/enabler.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)527-543
JournalJournal of Social Policy
Volume45
Issue number3
Early online date3 Feb 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2016

Fingerprint

welfare provision
lending
income
reform
customer
regulation
analysis
trend
qualitative interview
welfare state
everyday life
cause

Bibliographical note

Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Funder

Arts and Humanities Research Council, FinCris project [grant<br/>number AH/J001252/2].

Keywords

  • payday lending
  • regulation
  • welfare
  • insecurity
  • financialisation
  • credit

Cite this

Payday lending in the UK: the regul(aris)ation of a necessary evil? / Rowlingson, Karen; Appleyard, Lindsey; Gardner, Jodi.

In: Journal of Social Policy, Vol. 45, No. 3, 07.2016, p. 527-543.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rowlingson, Karen ; Appleyard, Lindsey ; Gardner, Jodi. / Payday lending in the UK: the regul(aris)ation of a necessary evil?. In: Journal of Social Policy. 2016 ; Vol. 45, No. 3. pp. 527-543.
@article{168fff8123214c7b878323c9c894b2b6,
title = "Payday lending in the UK: the regul(aris)ation of a necessary evil?",
abstract = "Concern about the increasing use of payday lending led the UK's Financial Conduct Authority to introduce landmark reforms in 2014/15. While these reforms have generally been welcomed as a way of curbing 'extortionate' and 'predatory' lending, this paper presents a more nuanced picture based on a theoretically-informed analysis of the growth and nature of payday lending combined with original and rigorous qualitative interviews with customers. We argue that payday lending has grown as a result of three major and inter-related trends: growing income insecurity for people both in and out of work; cuts in state welfare provision; and increasing financialisation. Recent reforms of payday lending do nothing to tackle these root causes. Our research also makes a major contribution to debates about the 'everyday life' of financialisation by focusing on the 'lived experience' of borrowers. We show that, contrary to the rather simplistic picture presented by the media and many campaigners, various aspects of payday lending are actually welcomed by customers, given the situations they are in. Tighter regulation may therefore have negative consequences for some. More generally, we argue that the regul(aris)ation of payday lending reinforces the shift in the role of the state from provider/redistributor to regulator/enabler.",
keywords = "payday lending, regulation, welfare, insecurity, financialisation, credit",
author = "Karen Rowlingson and Lindsey Appleyard and Jodi Gardner",
note = "Copyright {\circledC} Cambridge University Press 2016 This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.",
year = "2016",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1017/S0047279416000015",
language = "English",
volume = "45",
pages = "527--543",
journal = "Journal of Social Policy",
issn = "0047-2794",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Payday lending in the UK: the regul(aris)ation of a necessary evil?

AU - Rowlingson, Karen

AU - Appleyard, Lindsey

AU - Gardner, Jodi

N1 - Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PY - 2016/7

Y1 - 2016/7

N2 - Concern about the increasing use of payday lending led the UK's Financial Conduct Authority to introduce landmark reforms in 2014/15. While these reforms have generally been welcomed as a way of curbing 'extortionate' and 'predatory' lending, this paper presents a more nuanced picture based on a theoretically-informed analysis of the growth and nature of payday lending combined with original and rigorous qualitative interviews with customers. We argue that payday lending has grown as a result of three major and inter-related trends: growing income insecurity for people both in and out of work; cuts in state welfare provision; and increasing financialisation. Recent reforms of payday lending do nothing to tackle these root causes. Our research also makes a major contribution to debates about the 'everyday life' of financialisation by focusing on the 'lived experience' of borrowers. We show that, contrary to the rather simplistic picture presented by the media and many campaigners, various aspects of payday lending are actually welcomed by customers, given the situations they are in. Tighter regulation may therefore have negative consequences for some. More generally, we argue that the regul(aris)ation of payday lending reinforces the shift in the role of the state from provider/redistributor to regulator/enabler.

AB - Concern about the increasing use of payday lending led the UK's Financial Conduct Authority to introduce landmark reforms in 2014/15. While these reforms have generally been welcomed as a way of curbing 'extortionate' and 'predatory' lending, this paper presents a more nuanced picture based on a theoretically-informed analysis of the growth and nature of payday lending combined with original and rigorous qualitative interviews with customers. We argue that payday lending has grown as a result of three major and inter-related trends: growing income insecurity for people both in and out of work; cuts in state welfare provision; and increasing financialisation. Recent reforms of payday lending do nothing to tackle these root causes. Our research also makes a major contribution to debates about the 'everyday life' of financialisation by focusing on the 'lived experience' of borrowers. We show that, contrary to the rather simplistic picture presented by the media and many campaigners, various aspects of payday lending are actually welcomed by customers, given the situations they are in. Tighter regulation may therefore have negative consequences for some. More generally, we argue that the regul(aris)ation of payday lending reinforces the shift in the role of the state from provider/redistributor to regulator/enabler.

KW - payday lending

KW - regulation

KW - welfare

KW - insecurity

KW - financialisation

KW - credit

U2 - 10.1017/S0047279416000015

DO - 10.1017/S0047279416000015

M3 - Article

VL - 45

SP - 527

EP - 543

JO - Journal of Social Policy

JF - Journal of Social Policy

SN - 0047-2794

IS - 3

ER -