Passing the Turing Test Does Not Mean the End of Humanity

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)
62 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In this paper we look at the phenomenon that is the Turing test. We consider how Turing originally introduced his imitation game and discuss what this means in a practical scenario. Due to its popular appeal we also look into different representations of the test as indicated by numerous reviewers. The main emphasis here however is to consider what it actually means for a machine to pass the Turing test and what importance this has, if any. In particular does it mean that, as Turing put it, a machine can ‘think’. Specifically we consider claims that passing the Turing test means that machines will have achieved human-like intelligence and as a consequence the singularity will be upon us in the blink of an eye.

The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12559-015-9372-6
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)409-419
Number of pages11
JournalCognitive Computation
Volume8
Issue number3
Early online date28 Dec 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2016

Bibliographical note

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use,
distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Keywords

  • Deception Detection
  • Natural Language
  • Turing’s Imitation Game
  • Chatbots
  • Machine Misidentification

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Passing the Turing Test Does Not Mean the End of Humanity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this