Participants' experiences of care during a randomized controlled trial comparing a lay-facilitated angina management programme with usual care: A qualitative study using focus groups

P. Nelson, H. Cox, Gill Furze, R.J.P. Lewin, V. Morton, H. Norris, N. Patel, P. Elton, R. Carty

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    4 Citations (Scopus)
    2 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Aim: This paper is a report of a qualitative study conducted as part of a randomized controlled trial comparing a lay-facilitated angina management programme with usual care. Its aim was to explore participants' beliefs, experiences, and attitudes to the care they had received during the trial, particularly those who had received the angina management intervention. Background: Angina affects over 50 million people worldwide. Over half of these people have symptoms that restrict their daily life and would benefit from knowing how to manage their condition. Design: A nested qualitative study within a randomized controlled trial of lay-facilitated angina management. Method: We conducted four participant focus groups during 2008; three were with people randomized to the intervention and one with those randomized to control. We recruited a total of 14 participants to the focus groups, 10 intervention, and 4 control. Findings: Although recruitment to the focus groups was relatively low by comparison to conventional standards, each generated lively discussions and a rich data set. Data analysis demonstrated both similarities and differences between control and intervention groups. Similarities included low levels of prior knowledge about angina, whereas differences included a perception among intervention participants that lifestyle changes were more easily facilitated with the help and support of a lay-worker. Conclusion: Lay facilitation with the Angina Plan is perceived by the participants to be beneficial in supporting self-management. However, clinical expertise is still required to meet the more complex information and care needs of people with stable angina. Publisher statement: This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/), which permits users to copy, distribute and transmit the work for non-commercial purposes providing it is properly cited.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)840-850
    JournalJournal of Advanced Nursing
    Volume69
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2013

    Fingerprint

    Focus Groups
    Randomized Controlled Trials
    Licensure
    Stable Angina
    Self Care
    Life Style
    Control Groups

    Bibliographical note

    This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/), which permits users to copy, distribute and transmit the work for non-commercial purposes providing it is properly cited.

    Keywords

    • cardiac rehabilitation
    • focus groups
    • lay-led care
    • nursing
    • self-management
    • stable angina

    Cite this

    Participants' experiences of care during a randomized controlled trial comparing a lay-facilitated angina management programme with usual care: A qualitative study using focus groups. / Nelson, P.; Cox, H.; Furze, Gill; Lewin, R.J.P.; Morton, V.; Norris, H.; Patel, N.; Elton, P.; Carty, R.

    In: Journal of Advanced Nursing, Vol. 69, No. 4, 2013, p. 840-850.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Nelson, P. ; Cox, H. ; Furze, Gill ; Lewin, R.J.P. ; Morton, V. ; Norris, H. ; Patel, N. ; Elton, P. ; Carty, R. / Participants' experiences of care during a randomized controlled trial comparing a lay-facilitated angina management programme with usual care: A qualitative study using focus groups. In: Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2013 ; Vol. 69, No. 4. pp. 840-850.
    @article{3748d87bda39430696672d21097945e8,
    title = "Participants' experiences of care during a randomized controlled trial comparing a lay-facilitated angina management programme with usual care: A qualitative study using focus groups",
    abstract = "Aim: This paper is a report of a qualitative study conducted as part of a randomized controlled trial comparing a lay-facilitated angina management programme with usual care. Its aim was to explore participants' beliefs, experiences, and attitudes to the care they had received during the trial, particularly those who had received the angina management intervention. Background: Angina affects over 50 million people worldwide. Over half of these people have symptoms that restrict their daily life and would benefit from knowing how to manage their condition. Design: A nested qualitative study within a randomized controlled trial of lay-facilitated angina management. Method: We conducted four participant focus groups during 2008; three were with people randomized to the intervention and one with those randomized to control. We recruited a total of 14 participants to the focus groups, 10 intervention, and 4 control. Findings: Although recruitment to the focus groups was relatively low by comparison to conventional standards, each generated lively discussions and a rich data set. Data analysis demonstrated both similarities and differences between control and intervention groups. Similarities included low levels of prior knowledge about angina, whereas differences included a perception among intervention participants that lifestyle changes were more easily facilitated with the help and support of a lay-worker. Conclusion: Lay facilitation with the Angina Plan is perceived by the participants to be beneficial in supporting self-management. However, clinical expertise is still required to meet the more complex information and care needs of people with stable angina. Publisher statement: This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/), which permits users to copy, distribute and transmit the work for non-commercial purposes providing it is properly cited.",
    keywords = "cardiac rehabilitation, focus groups, lay-led care, nursing, self-management, stable angina",
    author = "P. Nelson and H. Cox and Gill Furze and R.J.P. Lewin and V. Morton and H. Norris and N. Patel and P. Elton and R. Carty",
    note = "This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/), which permits users to copy, distribute and transmit the work for non-commercial purposes providing it is properly cited.",
    year = "2013",
    doi = "10.1111/j.1365-2648.2012.06069.x",
    language = "English",
    volume = "69",
    pages = "840--850",
    journal = "Internet Journal of Advanced Nursing Practice",
    issn = "1523-6064",
    publisher = "Wiley",
    number = "4",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Participants' experiences of care during a randomized controlled trial comparing a lay-facilitated angina management programme with usual care: A qualitative study using focus groups

    AU - Nelson, P.

    AU - Cox, H.

    AU - Furze, Gill

    AU - Lewin, R.J.P.

    AU - Morton, V.

    AU - Norris, H.

    AU - Patel, N.

    AU - Elton, P.

    AU - Carty, R.

    N1 - This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/), which permits users to copy, distribute and transmit the work for non-commercial purposes providing it is properly cited.

    PY - 2013

    Y1 - 2013

    N2 - Aim: This paper is a report of a qualitative study conducted as part of a randomized controlled trial comparing a lay-facilitated angina management programme with usual care. Its aim was to explore participants' beliefs, experiences, and attitudes to the care they had received during the trial, particularly those who had received the angina management intervention. Background: Angina affects over 50 million people worldwide. Over half of these people have symptoms that restrict their daily life and would benefit from knowing how to manage their condition. Design: A nested qualitative study within a randomized controlled trial of lay-facilitated angina management. Method: We conducted four participant focus groups during 2008; three were with people randomized to the intervention and one with those randomized to control. We recruited a total of 14 participants to the focus groups, 10 intervention, and 4 control. Findings: Although recruitment to the focus groups was relatively low by comparison to conventional standards, each generated lively discussions and a rich data set. Data analysis demonstrated both similarities and differences between control and intervention groups. Similarities included low levels of prior knowledge about angina, whereas differences included a perception among intervention participants that lifestyle changes were more easily facilitated with the help and support of a lay-worker. Conclusion: Lay facilitation with the Angina Plan is perceived by the participants to be beneficial in supporting self-management. However, clinical expertise is still required to meet the more complex information and care needs of people with stable angina. Publisher statement: This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/), which permits users to copy, distribute and transmit the work for non-commercial purposes providing it is properly cited.

    AB - Aim: This paper is a report of a qualitative study conducted as part of a randomized controlled trial comparing a lay-facilitated angina management programme with usual care. Its aim was to explore participants' beliefs, experiences, and attitudes to the care they had received during the trial, particularly those who had received the angina management intervention. Background: Angina affects over 50 million people worldwide. Over half of these people have symptoms that restrict their daily life and would benefit from knowing how to manage their condition. Design: A nested qualitative study within a randomized controlled trial of lay-facilitated angina management. Method: We conducted four participant focus groups during 2008; three were with people randomized to the intervention and one with those randomized to control. We recruited a total of 14 participants to the focus groups, 10 intervention, and 4 control. Findings: Although recruitment to the focus groups was relatively low by comparison to conventional standards, each generated lively discussions and a rich data set. Data analysis demonstrated both similarities and differences between control and intervention groups. Similarities included low levels of prior knowledge about angina, whereas differences included a perception among intervention participants that lifestyle changes were more easily facilitated with the help and support of a lay-worker. Conclusion: Lay facilitation with the Angina Plan is perceived by the participants to be beneficial in supporting self-management. However, clinical expertise is still required to meet the more complex information and care needs of people with stable angina. Publisher statement: This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/), which permits users to copy, distribute and transmit the work for non-commercial purposes providing it is properly cited.

    KW - cardiac rehabilitation

    KW - focus groups

    KW - lay-led care

    KW - nursing

    KW - self-management

    KW - stable angina

    U2 - 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2012.06069.x

    DO - 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2012.06069.x

    M3 - Article

    VL - 69

    SP - 840

    EP - 850

    JO - Internet Journal of Advanced Nursing Practice

    JF - Internet Journal of Advanced Nursing Practice

    SN - 1523-6064

    IS - 4

    ER -