Participants' experiences of care during a randomized controlled trial comparing a lay-facilitated angina management programme with usual care: A qualitative study using focus groups

P. Nelson, H. Cox, Gill Furze, R.J.P. Lewin, V. Morton, H. Norris, N. Patel, P. Elton, R. Carty

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    4 Citations (Scopus)
    3 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Aim: This paper is a report of a qualitative study conducted as part of a randomized controlled trial comparing a lay-facilitated angina management programme with usual care. Its aim was to explore participants' beliefs, experiences, and attitudes to the care they had received during the trial, particularly those who had received the angina management intervention. Background: Angina affects over 50 million people worldwide. Over half of these people have symptoms that restrict their daily life and would benefit from knowing how to manage their condition. Design: A nested qualitative study within a randomized controlled trial of lay-facilitated angina management. Method: We conducted four participant focus groups during 2008; three were with people randomized to the intervention and one with those randomized to control. We recruited a total of 14 participants to the focus groups, 10 intervention, and 4 control. Findings: Although recruitment to the focus groups was relatively low by comparison to conventional standards, each generated lively discussions and a rich data set. Data analysis demonstrated both similarities and differences between control and intervention groups. Similarities included low levels of prior knowledge about angina, whereas differences included a perception among intervention participants that lifestyle changes were more easily facilitated with the help and support of a lay-worker. Conclusion: Lay facilitation with the Angina Plan is perceived by the participants to be beneficial in supporting self-management. However, clinical expertise is still required to meet the more complex information and care needs of people with stable angina. Publisher statement: This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/), which permits users to copy, distribute and transmit the work for non-commercial purposes providing it is properly cited.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)840-850
    JournalJournal of Advanced Nursing
    Volume69
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2013

    Bibliographical note

    This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/), which permits users to copy, distribute and transmit the work for non-commercial purposes providing it is properly cited.

    Keywords

    • cardiac rehabilitation
    • focus groups
    • lay-led care
    • nursing
    • self-management
    • stable angina

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Participants' experiences of care during a randomized controlled trial comparing a lay-facilitated angina management programme with usual care: A qualitative study using focus groups'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this