Abstract
Newborn bloodspot screening (NBS) is currently undergoing a ‘revolution’ (Spiekerkoetter et al., 2023). The development of new therapies (Vockley et al., 2023) and the piloting of whole genome sequencing in healthy newborns (e.g. Newborn Genomes Programme, UK, BabySeq USA) are challenging NBS practice and policy, as well as the Wilson & Jungner criteria (Wilson & Jungner, 1968) that underpin them (Andermann et al., 2008; Rahimzadeh et al., 2022; Vears et al., 2023). The capacity to screen for large numbers of variants simultaneously and generate data with potential relevance across the life course, and for family members beyond the screened infant, has prompted widespread discussion of the benefits (e.g., early identification and treatment of screened conditions) and harms (e.g., identification of variants of unknown clinical significance) that such high throughput screening programmes bring (Bick et al., 2022; Remec et al., 2021; Spiekerkoetter et al., 2023; Tluczek et al., 2022).
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 100455 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Journal | SSM - Qualitative Research in Health |
Volume | 6 |
Early online date | 24 Jun 2024 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Dec 2024 |
Bibliographical note
This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)Funder
This work was funded by NHS England/Department of Health and Social Care Ref: CFNGS.Funding
This work was funded by NHS England/Department of Health and Social Care Ref: CFNGS.
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
NHS England | CFNGS |
Department of Health and Social Care | CFNGS |