Abstract
Southern Africa has a well-documented history of intentional plant introductions for ornamental purposes, but some of these plants have become widespread damaging invaders. Conflicts can arise when stakeholders’ attitudes differ towards ornamental invasive plants and their management. We examined the views of stakeholders involved in the ornamental sector and environmental management across Southern Africa in light of the strategic actions proposed by the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services' thematic assessment on ‘Invasive Alien Species and their Control.’ Our analysis is based on semi-structured interviews, informal conversations, and observations with 78 environmental specialists, 30 ornamental-related industry staff, and 24 plant enthusiasts from Botswana, Namibia, Zimbabwe, South Africa, Zambia, Democratic Republic of Congo, and Eswatini. Our analysis shows that significant efforts are ongoing in Southern Africa to address biological invasions from the ornamental sector. However, they need more integration and consideration of the broader geopolitical and socio-historical context. We reflected on these needs and recommend: 1) improving cohesion and collaboration amongst stakeholders, 2) ensuring pluralism by recognising and valuing marginalised groups, 3) addressing power differences and superiority-inferiority complexes, and 4) seeking alliances with existing sub-regional groups working in the realm of nature-society interplay. We believe that our recommendations contribute toward the necessary transformative change for tackling the underlying political and economic causes of plant invasions derived from the ornamental sector in the sub-region.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 3203-3219 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| Journal | Environmental Management |
| Volume | 75 |
| Issue number | 12 |
| Early online date | 28 Aug 2025 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Dec 2025 |
Bibliographical note
Open access CC-BYFunding
Open access funding provided by Stellenbosch University. We are deeply grateful to our participants for their willingness to share their experiences and knowledge and make this research possible. We hope this work is useful for them. This research was funded by the Trailblazers Early Career Researcher and Doctoral Studentship Partnering Scheme from Coventry University (sub-project codes 13771-14 and 12160-02). Stellenbosch University and Botswana University of Agriculture and Natural Resources also supported the research. In addition, the landscaping unit of the Francistown city council (Botswana), the Botanical Society of Namibia and nursery businesses in Botswana and Zimbabwe gave logistical support to the first author (DRC). Special thanks to Lindsay Charter, Shirley Bethune, Mr. Kwape and Mr. Oatweng for their support and help against all odds. JRUW thanks the South African Department of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment (DFFE) for funding noting that this publication does not necessarily represent the views or opinions of DFFE or its employees. We are also grateful to the anonymous reviewers who provided the constructive critique that enabled this final version. Finally, DRC wants to thank the Funds of Women Graduates (FfWG), which provided her with a grant for her living expenses while inmersing in the publication process of this manuscript.
| Funders | Funder number |
|---|---|
| Stellenbosch University | |
| Department of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment | |
| Coventry University | 12160-02, 13771-14 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Global and Planetary Change
- Ecology
- Pollution
Themes
- Biodiversity, Ecology and Society
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Ornamental horticulture in Southern Africa: strategic actions to address biological invasions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS