On the Edge

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Community Development courses in UK Universities are on the periphery of institutions that are increasingly driven by business principles and adherent to the Higher Education ethos and market driven funding culture of the current Conservative government. This is a reflection of the world of austerity and cuts to public service budgets outside the University within which Community Development practitioners try to generate resilience and self reliance whilst being vulnerable themselves to closure of organisations and job losses with resultant insecurity. At the same time the profile of applicants to the Community Development course at this University has shifted and we are recruiting mostly women from working class communities local to the University, including strong representation of people who migrated to the UK as refugees and now have Indefinite Leave to remain in the UK. Market forces within and beyond the University result in vulnerability of the future of the course itself and even the staff of the course who have felt secure in their jobs for years move closer to becoming part of the insecure workforce along with the students and the staff of partner Third Sector organisations. To oversimplify, a course on the edge is recruiting people from communities on the edge to work in a sector on the edge. Staff, students and the sector share the challenges of marginalisation. Theoretical constructs about people in such liminal positions, will be applied to the particular circumstances of the course. These include work on ‘precarity’ by Pierre Bourdieu and Guy Standing; and Robert Castel’s three zones model. This chapter is about the implications of this for a Community Development and Social Care course in relation to integrity, ethics of recruitment, curriculum design, equality of opportunity, and sustainability. This is set against the background of what Barnett (2013) refers to as “emergence of a tacit idea of the corporate university” (p.1) influenced by a powerful ideology of neo-liberalism. Community Development educators in U.K. Universities face the challenge of how to equip people to transform their world whilst being beholden to a system primarily designed to serve the current social and economic system.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe Pedagogy of the Social Sciences Curriculum
EditorsJamie P. Halsall, Michael Snowden
Place of PublicationSwitzerland
PublisherSpringer Verlag
Pages39-54
Number of pages16
ISBN (Electronic)978-3-319-33868-2
ISBN (Print)978-3-319-33866-8
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Fingerprint

community development
staff
job loss
market
economic system
social system
applicant
neoliberalism
working class
resilience
community
public service
refugee
integrity
equality
vulnerability
budget
ideology
student
funding

Bibliographical note

This chapter is not available on the repository.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

Cressey, G. (2017). On the Edge. In J. P. Halsall, & M. Snowden (Eds.), The Pedagogy of the Social Sciences Curriculum (pp. 39-54). Switzerland: Springer Verlag.

On the Edge. / Cressey, Gill.

The Pedagogy of the Social Sciences Curriculum. ed. / Jamie P. Halsall; Michael Snowden. Switzerland : Springer Verlag, 2017. p. 39-54.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Cressey, G 2017, On the Edge. in JP Halsall & M Snowden (eds), The Pedagogy of the Social Sciences Curriculum. Springer Verlag, Switzerland, pp. 39-54.
Cressey G. On the Edge. In Halsall JP, Snowden M, editors, The Pedagogy of the Social Sciences Curriculum. Switzerland: Springer Verlag. 2017. p. 39-54
Cressey, Gill. / On the Edge. The Pedagogy of the Social Sciences Curriculum. editor / Jamie P. Halsall ; Michael Snowden. Switzerland : Springer Verlag, 2017. pp. 39-54
@inbook{244ef6b9fad14fb990411379443953a0,
title = "On the Edge",
abstract = "Community Development courses in UK Universities are on the periphery of institutions that are increasingly driven by business principles and adherent to the Higher Education ethos and market driven funding culture of the current Conservative government. This is a reflection of the world of austerity and cuts to public service budgets outside the University within which Community Development practitioners try to generate resilience and self reliance whilst being vulnerable themselves to closure of organisations and job losses with resultant insecurity. At the same time the profile of applicants to the Community Development course at this University has shifted and we are recruiting mostly women from working class communities local to the University, including strong representation of people who migrated to the UK as refugees and now have Indefinite Leave to remain in the UK. Market forces within and beyond the University result in vulnerability of the future of the course itself and even the staff of the course who have felt secure in their jobs for years move closer to becoming part of the insecure workforce along with the students and the staff of partner Third Sector organisations. To oversimplify, a course on the edge is recruiting people from communities on the edge to work in a sector on the edge. Staff, students and the sector share the challenges of marginalisation. Theoretical constructs about people in such liminal positions, will be applied to the particular circumstances of the course. These include work on ‘precarity’ by Pierre Bourdieu and Guy Standing; and Robert Castel’s three zones model. This chapter is about the implications of this for a Community Development and Social Care course in relation to integrity, ethics of recruitment, curriculum design, equality of opportunity, and sustainability. This is set against the background of what Barnett (2013) refers to as “emergence of a tacit idea of the corporate university” (p.1) influenced by a powerful ideology of neo-liberalism. Community Development educators in U.K. Universities face the challenge of how to equip people to transform their world whilst being beholden to a system primarily designed to serve the current social and economic system.",
author = "Gill Cressey",
note = "This chapter is not available on the repository.",
year = "2017",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-3-319-33866-8",
pages = "39--54",
editor = "Halsall, {Jamie P.} and Michael Snowden",
booktitle = "The Pedagogy of the Social Sciences Curriculum",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
address = "Austria",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - On the Edge

AU - Cressey, Gill

N1 - This chapter is not available on the repository.

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Community Development courses in UK Universities are on the periphery of institutions that are increasingly driven by business principles and adherent to the Higher Education ethos and market driven funding culture of the current Conservative government. This is a reflection of the world of austerity and cuts to public service budgets outside the University within which Community Development practitioners try to generate resilience and self reliance whilst being vulnerable themselves to closure of organisations and job losses with resultant insecurity. At the same time the profile of applicants to the Community Development course at this University has shifted and we are recruiting mostly women from working class communities local to the University, including strong representation of people who migrated to the UK as refugees and now have Indefinite Leave to remain in the UK. Market forces within and beyond the University result in vulnerability of the future of the course itself and even the staff of the course who have felt secure in their jobs for years move closer to becoming part of the insecure workforce along with the students and the staff of partner Third Sector organisations. To oversimplify, a course on the edge is recruiting people from communities on the edge to work in a sector on the edge. Staff, students and the sector share the challenges of marginalisation. Theoretical constructs about people in such liminal positions, will be applied to the particular circumstances of the course. These include work on ‘precarity’ by Pierre Bourdieu and Guy Standing; and Robert Castel’s three zones model. This chapter is about the implications of this for a Community Development and Social Care course in relation to integrity, ethics of recruitment, curriculum design, equality of opportunity, and sustainability. This is set against the background of what Barnett (2013) refers to as “emergence of a tacit idea of the corporate university” (p.1) influenced by a powerful ideology of neo-liberalism. Community Development educators in U.K. Universities face the challenge of how to equip people to transform their world whilst being beholden to a system primarily designed to serve the current social and economic system.

AB - Community Development courses in UK Universities are on the periphery of institutions that are increasingly driven by business principles and adherent to the Higher Education ethos and market driven funding culture of the current Conservative government. This is a reflection of the world of austerity and cuts to public service budgets outside the University within which Community Development practitioners try to generate resilience and self reliance whilst being vulnerable themselves to closure of organisations and job losses with resultant insecurity. At the same time the profile of applicants to the Community Development course at this University has shifted and we are recruiting mostly women from working class communities local to the University, including strong representation of people who migrated to the UK as refugees and now have Indefinite Leave to remain in the UK. Market forces within and beyond the University result in vulnerability of the future of the course itself and even the staff of the course who have felt secure in their jobs for years move closer to becoming part of the insecure workforce along with the students and the staff of partner Third Sector organisations. To oversimplify, a course on the edge is recruiting people from communities on the edge to work in a sector on the edge. Staff, students and the sector share the challenges of marginalisation. Theoretical constructs about people in such liminal positions, will be applied to the particular circumstances of the course. These include work on ‘precarity’ by Pierre Bourdieu and Guy Standing; and Robert Castel’s three zones model. This chapter is about the implications of this for a Community Development and Social Care course in relation to integrity, ethics of recruitment, curriculum design, equality of opportunity, and sustainability. This is set against the background of what Barnett (2013) refers to as “emergence of a tacit idea of the corporate university” (p.1) influenced by a powerful ideology of neo-liberalism. Community Development educators in U.K. Universities face the challenge of how to equip people to transform their world whilst being beholden to a system primarily designed to serve the current social and economic system.

M3 - Chapter

SN - 978-3-319-33866-8

SP - 39

EP - 54

BT - The Pedagogy of the Social Sciences Curriculum

A2 - Halsall, Jamie P.

A2 - Snowden, Michael

PB - Springer Verlag

CY - Switzerland

ER -