On simulating shoreline evolution using a hybrid 2D/one-line model

Avidesh Seenath

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)
84 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Hybrid 2D/one-line shoreline models are becoming increasingly applied over the mesoscale (101–102 years; 101–102 km) to inform coastal management. These models typically apply the one-line theory to simulate changes in shoreline morphology based on littoral drift gradients calculated from a 2DH coupled wave, flow, and sediment transport model. However, the key boundary conditions needed to effectively apply hybrid 2D/one-line models and their applicability beyond simple planform morphologies are uncertain, which can potentially comprise coastal management decisions. To address these uncertainties, an extensive numerical modelling campaign is carried out to both assess the sensitivity and calibrate an advanced hybrid 2D/one-line model (MIKE21) against six variables in three different sandy coastal system morphologies: (a) a simple planform morphology with a gentle sloping profile, (b) a simple planform morphology with a steep sloping profile, and (c) a complex planform morphology. The six variables considered include nearshore discretisation, bathymetry, bed friction, sand grain diameter, sand porosity, sediment grading, and the weir coefficient of hard defence structures. Five key conclusions are derived from the sensitivity testing and calibration results. First, the optimal boundary conditions for modelling shoreline evolution vary according to coastal geomorphology and processes. Second, specifying boundary conditions within physically realistic ranges does not guarantee reliable shoreline evolution predictions. Third, nearshore discretisation should be treated as a typical calibration parameter as (a) the finest discretisation does not guarantee the most accurate predictions, and (b) defining a discretisation based on process length scales also does not guarantee reliable predictions. Fourth, hybrid 2D/one-line models are not valid for application in complex planform morphologies plausibly because of the one-line theory assumption of a spatially invariable closure depth. Fifth, hybrid 2D/one-line models have limited applicability in simple planform morphologies where the active beach profile is subject to direct human modification, plausibly due to the one-line theory assumption of a constant time-averaged coastal profile form. These findings provide key theoretical insights into the drivers of shoreline evolution in sandy coastal systems, which have practical implications for refining the continued application of shoreline evolution models.
Original languageEnglish
Article number104216
Number of pages22
JournalCoastal Engineering
Volume178
Early online date17 Sept 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2022

Bibliographical note

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Funder

Sincerest thanks to Laura Turnbull (Durham University), Richard Hardy (Durham University), and Ian Shennan (Durham University) for providing useful suggestions on various aspects of this study. Earlier versions of this paper were presented at the Coastal Zone Canada 2018 Conference, ECSA 57, DHI Ireland 2018 Symposium, and the 2019 UK Young Coastal Scientists and Engineers Conference. The comments received from the participants at these events and the two anonymous reviewers have been helpful in refining the paper. I am grateful to DHI Water Environments UK Ltd for providing access to MIKE21 (2016–2020) and Mark Bailes for his technical support and assistance with the software

Keywords

  • Shoreline evolution modelling
  • One-line theory
  • Coastal geomorphology
  • Boundary conditions
  • Sandy coasts

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'On simulating shoreline evolution using a hybrid 2D/one-line model'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this