On Legitimacy: Designer as Minor Scientist

Aysar Ghassan, M. Blythe

    Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

    3 Citations (Scopus)
    2 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    User experience research has recently been characterized in two camps, model based and design based, with contrasting approaches to measurement and evaluation. This paper argues that the two positions can be constructed in terms of Deleuze and Guattari’s “royal science” and “minor science”. It is argued that the “reinvention” of cultural probes is an example of a minor scientific methodology re-conceptualised as a royal scientific “technology”. The distinction between royal and minor science provides insight into the nature of legitimacy within contemporary HCI research practice.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages2149-2158
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Sep 2013

    Fingerprint

    User Experience
    Scientific Methodology
    Designer
    Human-computer Interaction
    Research Practice
    Félix Guattari
    Gilles Deleuze
    Evaluation
    Legitimacy

    Bibliographical note

    Statement © ACM, 2013. This is the author's version of the work. It is posted here by permission of ACM for your personal use. Not for redistribution. The definitive version was published in Proceedings of the CHI '13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems {pp. 2149-2158, (2013)} http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2468356.2468735.

    Keywords

    • Deleuze
    • Guattari
    • Design
    • Legitimacy
    • Cultural Probes
    • User Experience.

    Cite this

    On Legitimacy: Designer as Minor Scientist. / Ghassan, Aysar; Blythe, M.

    2013. 2149-2158.

    Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

    @conference{f365aa0e3e5a47c195e54b4dbc8ae1d0,
    title = "On Legitimacy: Designer as Minor Scientist",
    abstract = "User experience research has recently been characterized in two camps, model based and design based, with contrasting approaches to measurement and evaluation. This paper argues that the two positions can be constructed in terms of Deleuze and Guattari’s “royal science” and “minor science”. It is argued that the “reinvention” of cultural probes is an example of a minor scientific methodology re-conceptualised as a royal scientific “technology”. The distinction between royal and minor science provides insight into the nature of legitimacy within contemporary HCI research practice.",
    keywords = "Deleuze, Guattari, Design, Legitimacy, Cultural Probes, User Experience.",
    author = "Aysar Ghassan and M. Blythe",
    note = "Statement {\circledC} ACM, 2013. This is the author's version of the work. It is posted here by permission of ACM for your personal use. Not for redistribution. The definitive version was published in Proceedings of the CHI '13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems {pp. 2149-2158, (2013)} http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2468356.2468735.",
    year = "2013",
    month = "9",
    doi = "10.1145/2468356.2468735",
    language = "English",
    pages = "2149--2158",

    }

    TY - CONF

    T1 - On Legitimacy: Designer as Minor Scientist

    AU - Ghassan, Aysar

    AU - Blythe, M.

    N1 - Statement © ACM, 2013. This is the author's version of the work. It is posted here by permission of ACM for your personal use. Not for redistribution. The definitive version was published in Proceedings of the CHI '13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems {pp. 2149-2158, (2013)} http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2468356.2468735.

    PY - 2013/9

    Y1 - 2013/9

    N2 - User experience research has recently been characterized in two camps, model based and design based, with contrasting approaches to measurement and evaluation. This paper argues that the two positions can be constructed in terms of Deleuze and Guattari’s “royal science” and “minor science”. It is argued that the “reinvention” of cultural probes is an example of a minor scientific methodology re-conceptualised as a royal scientific “technology”. The distinction between royal and minor science provides insight into the nature of legitimacy within contemporary HCI research practice.

    AB - User experience research has recently been characterized in two camps, model based and design based, with contrasting approaches to measurement and evaluation. This paper argues that the two positions can be constructed in terms of Deleuze and Guattari’s “royal science” and “minor science”. It is argued that the “reinvention” of cultural probes is an example of a minor scientific methodology re-conceptualised as a royal scientific “technology”. The distinction between royal and minor science provides insight into the nature of legitimacy within contemporary HCI research practice.

    KW - Deleuze

    KW - Guattari

    KW - Design

    KW - Legitimacy

    KW - Cultural Probes

    KW - User Experience.

    U2 - 10.1145/2468356.2468735

    DO - 10.1145/2468356.2468735

    M3 - Paper

    SP - 2149

    EP - 2158

    ER -